User talk:Babarali (mittar)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Babarali (mittar). We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:MedPGR - All medical information, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DIVINE 17:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MedPGR - All medical information (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DIVINE was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MedPGR - All medical information and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DIVINE 17:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Babarali (mittar)! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DIVINE 17:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derrick Young Jr (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Thatguy1987 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derrick Young Jr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yoga, you may be blocked from editing. RegentsPark (comment) 01:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Please could you tell me correct way to edit wikipedia to source my research article? Babarali (mittar) (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure your question makes sense. Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia. Editors contribute to it to describe facts, which others can verify by checking the cited sources. Those sources must be agreed by editors to be reliable. This means that they must come from reputable sources - textbooks from known publishers, academic journals known to practice independent peer review, national newspapers and broadcasters which are known to check their facts against a strict editorial policy. Personal blogs, wikis, forums and single-interest websites do not meet this criterion.

Editors are not completely forbidden to cite their own work, but it is strongly discouraged, as it frequently leads to poor editing decisions through conflict of interest.

To return to your question, what do you mean by "to source my research article"?

--- If you are reading Wikipedia's well-cited coverage of Yoga topics to investigate some area so that you can write a piece on your website, your best approach is to check the sources that we cite, and you will find that the news and scholarly sources will be detailed, informative, and authoritative on each topic. Your website can then provide links to the sources you used.

--- If you mean you wish to copy a Wikipedia article, you are free to do so, provided you acknowledge the copying.

--- If you mean "how do I advertise my website on Wikipedia?", the answer is that you cannot, and you will be blocked from editing if you continue to try to do so.

--- Ah. If you mean "how do I get the draft article about my business that was already rejected once approved?", then the answer is as above, you wait until multiple, reliable, independent sources discuss the business, and then you can use the sources in the draft. At the moment you have unwisely taken on a conflict of interest and supplied only the weakest of primary sourcing, so notability is conspicuously not established. I see another editor (who has created an account for this single edit) has then resubmitted the draft without making any of the required improvements, so you can expect it to fail for the same reason as before (I take no part in the draft evaluation process). Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chiswick Chap for your clarification. If anybody is a professional degree holder in a specific field then can he/she source their blog article on wikipedia?

Becuase I am RD Nutritionist at Nishtar_Hospital. I have proper knowledge of my field can I source my article on wikipedia. I have already published 2 research articles in Journals, 4 Abstracts in books, 5 articles in newspapers and 30+ blog article. Babarali (mittar) (talk) 08:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:COI. You are an involved party, and as such it is very inadvisable to continue. As for the article, I think it unlikely to be notable so editing it is probably a waste of time, it will likely be deleted. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for your information. Babarali (mittar) (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And you must immediately stop trying to add advertising links to Yoga articles, it is totally forbidden, and editors will notice every time. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 01:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MedPGR - All medical information

Hello, Babarali (mittar). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MedPGR - All medical information, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MedPGR - All medical information

Hello, Babarali (mittar). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MedPGR - All medical information".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Derrick Young Jr

Hello, Babarali (mittar). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Derrick Young Jr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MedPGR - All medical information

Hello, Babarali (mittar). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MedPGR - All medical information".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]