User talk:Badger151

Hi - Welcome to my talk page. Just click below to leave a message.
(Click here to leave me a message. Or a massage.)
ARCHIVES may be found below the table of contents

Archive

Archive

Welcome!

Hello Badger151, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --HappyCamper 02:31, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:USS Maine (ACR-1)

Nice work on the article, I see you've beefed it up quite a bit. I see no reason to leave the tag now although there is always room for improvement with anything on WP:) Burningview ✉ 02:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback, not a massage

Hello, Badger151. You have new messages at Lost on belmont's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lost on Belmont (talk) 01:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Central

Hi, Badger151,

Thank you for un-doing my changes to the Grand Central Terminal story. I have no idea what I did, however, I knew that I did it and didn't know how to un-do it - so, Thanks.

I do find many factual errors in Wikipedia, and I have changed several - but never "hit" the wrong key.

So, I still don't know how to change things back. I do know that all of my changes are correct, though.

Duke Moon Dukemoon (talk) 04:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auxiliary Steam Propulsion

Quite a lot of ships have two methods of propulsion, and I think you should be very cautious about applying the category auxiliary steamers to them. Steam warships from the 1840s-70s often had sails and steam. In some cases sails were a back-up system. The usual reason for having both sail and steam was to use steam as the primary method of propulsion in action, and sails as the primary method when not in action - you could think of this as steam for tactical movement and sails for strategic movement. I think that you should only apply the category auxiliary steamers to ships that used steam as a back up system.

I have reverted your edits to the British steam two-deckers Agamemnon and Sans Pareil because these were steam line-of-battle ships; their primary method of propulsion in action was steam.--Toddy1 (talk) 06:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Sail ships given steam engines

Category:Sail ships given steam engines, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reminder: sign your comment!--64.118.216.38 (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)signed: --Badger151 (talk) 21:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	thanks for the tip yeah im new but i got to know wiki well and the costa concordia i think when changing poorly write sentenses i just killed a bit of another part :/ Tincanmansiimon (talk) 23:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Shift from car based to truck and van based ambulances

Hey, don't sweat it. It's a perfectly legitimate topic. ----DanTD (talk) 03:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ambulance emergency response vehicle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sedan and Mall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Technical investigation of the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.64.141 (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Badger151. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXOHLbXwbpfYC1f?Q_DL=e3DsAymc9y4ljrD_eXOHLbXwbpfYC1f_MLRP_3WrIPdRfNGmH5B3&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Badger151. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Camera car moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Camera car, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 16:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Camera car concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Camera car, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Camera car concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Camera car, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Camera car

Hello, Badger151. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Camera car".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]