User talk:BakuninGoldmanKropotkin
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, BakuninGoldmanKropotkin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Acroterion (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 23:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi Eric, I saw your post to the above article. I can't say that I'm familiar with Déjacque and so can't really comment on what you said. However, can I suggest that the article talk page is a better place to raise such things? Unless people notice a comment being inserted in an article on their watch list or make a nearby edit themselves, then it tends to get lost. A talk page comment tends to be more likely to be spotted and allows people to exchange views on a suggestion's appropriateness.
Another place you can consider making suggestions is a relevant WikiProject talk page, in this case Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Anarchism which you might care to join. As there are separate articles on the history of anarchism, Proudhon and mutualism, then there could be scope for a broader discussion on where Déjacque belongs in the heirarchy of articles written in WP:Summary style.--Peter cohen (talk) 22:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Zionist Occupation Government
[edit]Hi, you added {POV-section} to the top of this entry, but left no indication on the talk page or even in the edit summary what you think the issue is. You also don't indicate which section is to blame (or is it the lead?) Do you think you can clarify? Thanks. Hairhorn (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Replied on article talk page. Hairhorn (talk) 01:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)