User talk:BallSniff544

Welcome!

Hello, BallSniff544, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mid-Life Crustacean did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Randompointofview (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joji (musician) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Joji (musician) was changed by BallSniff544 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883434 on 2023-03-12T07:34:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:34, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mid-Life Crustacean, you may be blocked from editing. Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 07:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BallSniff544 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here BallSniff544 (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Only one open request is needed. 331dot (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BallSniff544 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can you please unblock my account, It says I abused multiple accounts, when I didn't, I just made different accounts because this account was blocked for disruptive editing, even though I have no idea how I was being disruptive at all. If you look at all my edits, Im just trying to make articles better, I'm not vandalizing anything and I was never trying to disrupt anything.can you like give me one more chance, I'll learn what being disruptive means and I'll try to change my username. I didn't know their was a policy on inappropriate usernames. BallSniff544 (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is blocked for an inappropriate username and being a vandalism only account, not for using multiple accounts, which leads me to think that you have indeed used multiple accounts. We're going to need you to learn how you were disruptive before being unblocked, not after. 331dot (talk) 17:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BallSniff544 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

bro I got blocked for disruptive editing, but idk why tho? I was literally contributing to wikipedia like a normal human being, and I got blocked for no reason, the reason why it took me so long to appeal this block is because I just found out how to appeal just recently. So yeah, can you please unblock me, I don't vandalize anything, there was only one time I vandalized a article and that was on accident, so yeah, I don't know why I was blocked, can you like give me another chance bro. BallSniff544 (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BallSniff544 (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BallSniff544 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay my second appeal was rejected because I "abused multiple accounts". I literally didn't tho, I got blocked on all my other accounts because the other accounts were sock puppets. I didn't abuse anything, if I did, can you please tell me how exactly. And I literally got the BallSniff account blocked for no reason besides my username. I was never told their was a username policy until after I got blocked and now I can't make new accounts for some reason. Also they said they also blocked me for abuse on this account as well, however if you look at my edits on articles I edited, you can see I didn't abuse anything. This is totally unfair or something BallSniff544 (talk) 18:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I got blocked on all my other accounts because the other accounts were sock puppets." Thanks for admitting you are evading a block. Talk page access removed. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I removed your duplicate request that you placed in the section header- please only place edits in the large edit window, not the smaller section header window. The mere fact that you were using other accounts is abuse of multiple accounts. If any one of your accounts is blocked, you may not edit under any account or IP and you may not make other accounts until the initial block is removed. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]