User talk:BarnardKnox
Welcome!
Hello, BarnardKnox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Hannibal Fogg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Esowteric+Talk 13:39, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hannibal Fogg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Hannibal Fogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Could be a hoax related to a forthcoming novel Hannibal Fogg and the Supreme Secret of Man by Tahir Shah. Create again as a fictional character as and when the novel is published and attains notability. Willing to be corrected if anyone can verify the references provided (excluding recent additions to other Wikipedia articles).
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Esowteric+Talk 13:39, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Insertion of fake references
[edit]I am concerned that your main activity in Wikipedia seems to consist in inserting references to "Hannibal Fogg", who does not appear to have existed, seemingly in support of an upcoming book by Tahir Shah asserting that he did.
Wikipedia is not intended as a platform for literary promotion and the creation of alternative universes, laudable pursuits though these may be in themselves. I would be grateful if you could save us the time and effort of undoing your spurious edits, and undo them yourself. Also please read WP:HOAX. --JN466 16:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've replied to you on my talk page, and you may also want to have a look at User_talk:Durova#Hoax_articles, where you are currently being discussed. Best, --JN466 19:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've expanded on my earlier response to you on my talk page. --JN466 19:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- (edit conflicted) Hi, Jayen appears to be raising meritorious concerns. Searches for the name "Hannibal Fogg" are not turning up results in Google Books checks of the books you have cited. For instance, Balliol College: A History returns a snippet from page 253 on a search for the word "college" although page 253 is not part of the preview.[1] Your citation refers to Knox at page 255, which is also not part of the preview. But if the search feature operates consistently then we ought to see a snippet view of that name on page 255. Yet the only result for the name "Hannibal" yields a "Hannibal Baskerville" at page 110.[2] Could you explain the discrepancy, perhaps? Google scanned the second edition from 1997, which is the same source you cited. Durova325 19:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)