User talk:Barry m

Welcome!

Hello, Barry m, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mustaqbal 15:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Backpacking Rewrite

Barry. I saw in the history for the Backpacking (travel) article that you added the NPOV tag. I just completed a huge rewrite of the article and I'd love some feedback from you on the article's current strengths and weaknesses. I could really use some more help on this because I want to get it to FA status. Thanks! --circuitloss 01:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Otley Run

I notice you've edited the Otley Run page in the past. It's now being proposed for deletion. I thought you may like to visit its Articles for Deletion page to leave your thoughts. Regards, Jamse 18:30, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Project

Hi, my name is Federico (alias Pain) and I am creating a section for nominating th best user page, I was wondering if you were interested in joining the project.

The project has just started, and we need help to spread the word and ameliorate it.

Wikipedia:Votes_for_best_User_page

Best regards, Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 14:25, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shimmin

A tag has been placed on Shimmin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Blair - Speak to me 00:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Shimmin

I don't know about all of them, but an article on a student hall housing 40 people? Please. Wikipedia isn't a LU campus directory. If any building is independently notable, that is, if any building has a well-known or interesting history discussed by multiple reliable sources, then it would merit an article. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're not quite getting this notability bit: in the context of Wikipedia policies, notability is not any simple trait particular to a subject. The assertion that it is the last all-female hall is a bit of trivia relevant more to the history of Leeds University than to the basis of an article. Is there a housing shortage at LU? Drop in a sentence about it at the main article, provided that you can back up this analysis by an independent secondary source. University housing shortages and all-female dorms are fairly common, these simple facts don't magically bestow notability to small, individual halls. Did a historic event occur in the hall? Was it the first of its kind? Has it received significant media coverage? To start an article you need a solid basis and potential for growth. Could you ever write more than a paragraph on this hall? If not, then maybe you should focus on a centralized article, maybe something like Housing at Leeds University. Uncited stubs that have no future and don't assert notability are regularly deleted. You may choose to contest this deletion at WP:DRV, but I don't think you'll find a sympathetic audience. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 01:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

University of Leeds Accommodation

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article University of Leeds Accommodation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of University of Leeds Accommodation. Toddst1 (talk) 12:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Shimmin

I've merged the edit history of Shimmin with University of Leeds accommodation. Good luck with the list ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 15:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming a spammer

Hi Barry m. Could I note that welcoming a spammer, as you did at User talk:Hoodia2006, may not be a good idea. While assuming good faith is important, it can also be misapplied. Your welcome message says "thank you for your contributions" which is definitely not a good message to send to that particular user. Did you review the users contributions before leaving the message? Did you see the spam warning I had left on their talk page just a few minutes before your welcome message?

The Hoodia article is a magnet for some of the worst and most blatant spam found on Wikipedia, of which this is a perfect example. Please do welcome new users, but please take a moment before doing so to see if these are people we actually want on Wikipedia. Thanks, Gwernol 15:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Do you have a 3RR bot running? How does someone run a bot through their account? Alatari (talk) 08:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you were handing out 3RR warnings without taking part in the discussion it appeared to me a bot was responsible. Alatari (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya

Ok, done. In a future I would like to discuss the large number of character article. Se for example Wikipedia:Pokémon test.Tintor2 (talk) 12:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attack pages etc.

Thanks for alerting to the Shane lieberman page. Nevertheless, Afd is not the right place to bring attack pages or pure vandalism. Rather, in such a case speedy deletion criteria apply and the page can e.g be tagged with {{db_attack}}. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution rejected

I just wanted to let you know, in case you weren't aware, that Alatari is rejecting your recent dispute resolution on the Chief Illiniwek page as well as continuing to accuse me of being a sockpuppet. Could you please continue your help and involvement with this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhetor230 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your help. It's been almost two weeks with no contibs from anyone on the chief illiniwek issue. How much longer do we have to wait before moving on? Rhetor230 (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once more for your help. Rhetor230 (talk) 07:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning made in error

Reverting vandalism attempts by sockpuppets DOES NOT COUNT as vandalism. My reverts were made because the edits made by various users (all who have since been banned as sockpuppets) were compromising the integrity of Wikipedia via the insertion of fake materials. I have seen the program (The Golden Path) and I know what they wrote were completely fake.

I wish you would apologize for this warning that is made in error. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would enlist the help of various admins to help. You can help too. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 07:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Golden Path (drama)

User:Arbiteroftruth's edits on the above page are merely a response to a user using multiple abusive sockpuppets who I have since blocked, so there is no concern over a violation of WP:3rr. Cowman109^Talk 07:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nevermind, you already responded to your comment on his page ;P Cowman109^Talk 07:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third Opinion at Standard article

See Talk:Standard#Resolution_of_problem, De facto standard and Talk:De facto standard. Thanks a lot! -- anon 17 Feb. 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.153.155.90 (talk) 17:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Iced Bun.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Iced Bun.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sedgefieldballgame.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Sedgefieldballgame.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 12:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you~

Thank you for welcoming me so cordially to Wikipedia! Even if it was just an automated message, I felt glad that I was wanted here. It's nice to have a welcoming committee! Love, Chocolate Panic! (talk) 06:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clarence Dock Student Residence

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Clarence Dock Student Residence, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Clarence Dock Student Residence – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Abductive (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Perforator.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Perforator.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wizard191 (talk) 22:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 18:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Lynx 3Generations.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lynx 3Generations.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of University of Leeds accommodation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Leeds accommodation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Leeds accommodation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 18:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Leeds University logo part.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leeds University logo part.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Otley Run for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Otley Run is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otley Run (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coretheapple (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Referendum - edits

Hi Barry,

Just wondering whether you'd be happy to talk to me about your activity on the 2014 Scottish Referendum page? I'm writing from a podcast production company based in the UK and we're making a documentary series about Wikipedia. Would love to ask you more about your activity during the referendum in a half-hour chat - please do let me know.

Thanks! All best,

Wearecrowd (talk) 12:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Barry - would love to chat to you if you're up for it! Nothing controversial, just want to hear what it's like updating a rapidly changing news situation on Wikipedia. Cheers.

Wearecrowd (talk) 11:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]