User talk:Baseballbaker23

Re: MechQuest

See here. If you'd like to have the deletion overturned, use deletion review. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Church destruction date

Oops thats my fault. You assumed correctly; 1009 was the date in the source [24]. --Al Ameer son (talk) 21:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure really. I just found a web page that listed most of Bethlehem's sister cities. I don't know how a city qualifies as a "sister city". --Al Ameer son (talk) 01:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1680394 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 16:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

This is a school's network, so it's irritating for everyone to be blocked for what the one sophomore has been doing (although I do understand the reasoning).

Went to remove, did not show up. Either it already expired or someone else undid the ab. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 16:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who Wrote this?

Referring to the wikipage House of Bonaparte and in the section Current descendants. Did you write this...? "There are, however, numerous descendants of Napoleon's illegitimate, but recognized son Walewski from his union with Marie, Countess Walewski. Of these include the Wattier family and its union with the Bonaparte family. The later descendants were the Peschongs and Herrs."

I ask, because I am a member of this mentioned family. Although there have been rumors passed down through the generations of a possible connection to Napoleon, it has not been proven. Therefor without proof, without a source, this paragraph should not be included in the Current descendants section. I would like to know what your source is. Thank you. Rehcraesiler (talk) 07:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]