User talk:Basilex

Andrus Ansip

I briefly reverted your edit to Andrus Ansip... but then I noticed it was correct. I've put it back. Sorry for the confusion! Moyabrit (talk) 12:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice that we avoided mutual misunderstanding. (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A'Cappella ExpreSSS

I will be happy to do a peer review for the article, but you should first complete the peer review request on the article's talk page, as I see it still says "follow this link", rather than displaying a link to the peer review page itself. Thanks, Kakofonous (talk) 01:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is displaying now, just took a while to get through the automation. I'll start my review. Kakofonous (talk) 01:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just repaired the link to group's off.site (you could not check it out because I wrote .ru instead of .com). Site has an english version (so probably we need small re-formatting of 'external links' section).

Using references from the band's website is not ideal (see Wikipedia:Verifiability), but if those are the only ones you can find at the moment, it is okay. Kakofonous (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, definitely not ' the only', but a large portion of the links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.21.137.115 (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is most definitely okay (it is actually very good) to use multiple references, to confirm any facts, in the same article. Kakofonous (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is. Kakofonous (talk) 20:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]