User talk:Beembly

Speedy deletion nomination of List of tools used in sex offender forensic psychological evaluations

Hello Beembly,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of tools used in sex offender forensic psychological evaluations for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 04:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beembly, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Beembly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are User:Nathan Larson/User:Tisane/User:Leucosticte (etc.)....

If you are User:Nathan Larson/User:Tisane/User:Leucosticte (etc.), then go ahead and admit it; we've already been over this: User talk:Flyer22/Archive 18#Why banned users keep coming back, despite attempts to remove their incentives.

Even if you state that you are not him, you edit just like him. And if you are not him, you clearly are not a WP:Newbie, and I'm certain that you are one of the problematic editors I've interacted with before. Therefore, I am WP:Pinging Alison to this matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kurt Bumby

The article Kurt Bumby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Discussed on talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Crossroads- (talk) 04:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]