User talk:Bengalurumaga

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Article CNN is under discretionary sanctions. Your recent edit violated Enforced BRD: If an edit you make is challenged by reversion you must discuss the issue on the article talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit) before reinstating your edit. I suggest you self-revert. O3000 (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to American Airlines have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 22:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mahlzeit , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of 1RR and 24-hr BRD cycle at Economic policy of Donald Trump

This edit is a violation of 1RR and 24-hr BRD cycle at Economic policy of Donald Trump.[1] You should self-revert immediately. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 18:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Hi there, when changes you make are reverted, as they were here, your recourse per our Bold, Revert, Discuss process is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the changes you wish to make, not to resubmit them as you did here. These resubmissions without consensus are disruptive, and are considered edit-warring, which I see you have already been warned about. If you keep it up, you might quickly find your editing privileges interrupted, which would be unfortunate for something so avoidable. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and it seems fairly clear that you are editing from 141.76.121.211 to continue your edit-warring and to avoid any discussions. Note that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bengalurumaga (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

request for unblocking. Most of the changes were made in good fatih.

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is abuse of multiple accounts, but you do not discuss that here. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.