User talk:Benvenuto

Headings

Hello. I've noticed that on some of your articles you have used the first-level headings (i.e. =Heading=). The Wikipedia style is to use second-level headings (using ==) for stuff like External links and See also. Thanks! —Wereon 16:13, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. in my rush of first enthusiam I neglected to study the style page and just kept copying the first page I edited, mistakes and all.Benvenuto 11:47, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Norge

Nice additions today. Congrats. JHCC (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx. Have to dig for some more info tho. Everyone concentrates on Italia and the crash! Benvenuto 12:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:N4-Italia15_05_1928.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:N4-Italia15_05_1928.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 07:39, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lgehumble 1400.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lgehumble 1400.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. --cohesion★talk 22:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lgenorth 3guns.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lgenorth 3guns.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. --cohesion★talk 22:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SL20.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SL20.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 17:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OPV AIDS - Cribb fears

Hi, I'm editing OPV AIDS and see your comments about Cribb having reservations about neutrality of Nature - Do you have a cite for this? The present form of the article is embarassing in its lack of acknowledgement of complexity of this hypothesis. SmithBlue (talk) 00:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Lgenorth 3guns.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lgenorth 3guns.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC) --Polly (Parrot) 21:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Zhengrong_Shi.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Zhengrong_Shi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1494946 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Ronald DeFeo, Jr.

The link to a site was removed on the grounds that it was trojan infected in this edit. In the interests of assuming good faith, please could you explain why the site is trojan infected? Thanks, --♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 09:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, accessing that site activated my antivirus (MacAfee OAS with latest update). The message was "Attempted trojan attack" or words to that effect. It looks like the site has not been updated for some time, it may have been compromised without the owners knowledge. I can check again if you like, and give you the exact wordingBenvenuto (talk) 06:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One possibility is that the anti-virus software was giving a false positive, which does happen sometimes. I am running AVG, and visited the site without any ill effects or messages. It would be a pity to remove the link without being sure about this.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 07:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I got the message again that it was infected with "JS/Redirector.a"

see: http://www.microsoft.com/security/portal/Threat/Encyclopedia/Entry.aspx?Name=Trojan%3AJS%2FRedirector.A&ThreatID=-2147392062 Benvenuto (talk) 07:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sara Shane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aldara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Birtles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaumont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Shaw reference

Hi. I noticed on the percussion cap page that you seem to have been the one who made the claim that Joshua Shaw's priority in the development of the percussion cap is dubious, but you don't seem to have provided any references. I was wondering if maybe you could provide some for me here and then either you or I could add them to the page.SQMeaner (talk) 16:59, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its in "Early percussion Firearms" by Lewis Winant. Its an old source but as far as books go its pretty much a magnum opus on this subject. I have have not kept up with the latest research in scholarly arms journals so I don't know what the current consensus is. "Journal of the arms and armour society" or"American socity of Arms collectors" bulletin may provide a definitive answer.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Benvenuto (talk • contribs) 04:00, 21 June 2015‎

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Benvenuto, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Jack van Tongeren has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page.
This is an old edit here from March 2009. But the text includes an exact copy of the last 3 sentences, and a large chunk of the sixth paragraph of this article in 'The Age' on 31 July 2004. (Which you also added as a source.) 220 of ^Borg 20:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Benvenuto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Benvenuto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]