User talk:BigLittleColin

Welcome!

Hello, BigLittleColin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 21:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2015

Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Breaking Bad (season 5) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 17:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Breaking Bad (season 5). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. If you think your edit is constructive, please discuss it first on the articles talk page before editing again. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 18:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Breaking Bad (season 5) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Public sector.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Public sector was changed by BigLittleColin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939482 on 2015-12-03T03:36:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Striking the ClueBot warning, the edit was in no sense vandalism, although there is room for debate whether it was an improvement: Noyster (talk), 10:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent reverts

Hello BigLittleColin, sorry to see you've had that experience. Please continue to contribute, it's not always that bad! My advice, if one of your edits is reverted, even once, don't just reinstate it as someone is certain to call that "edit warring". Either let it go or open a discussion: the article's talk page is the recommended place to make your case, although since many of these are little watched, it's best to also put a brief comment linking to that talk page on the reverting editor's user talk page and that of anyone else who has entered the debate. Good luck: Noyster (talk), 11:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]