User talk:Bigfatman8766

Welcome!

Hello, Bigfatman8766! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Freddy Fazbear 23’ incident

I don’t wanna be apologetic but that shit was funny 2001:B07:A3B:6604:187B:66A4:B088:84EF (talk) 13:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bigfatman8766. Thank you for your work on Reliance, Washington. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliance, Washington moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Reliance, Washington. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sounder Bruce 00:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harmony, Washington moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Harmony, Washington. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sounder Bruce 00:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious Topics alert

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 05:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in American football, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, major countries like the US and Canada are generally not linked per MOS:OVERLINK. —Bagumba (talk) 14:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rankin

Thank you for trying, but the information you provided is entirely redundant to what I already had (namely, you just provided more instances of the same 1896 death notice). Further, it misses the point: lists of everyone who was a member of the Supreme Court of Washington Territory exist, but don't include Rankin. I've reverted your edit. DS (talk) 19:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reliance, Washington has been accepted

Reliance, Washington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 20:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time to republish the Draft:Harmony, Washington?

Hey Bigfatman8766!

I've taken the liberty to help build up the Harmony, Washington draft you began. Found plenty of local sourcing and the draft should now be ready to publish. I personally don't mind the Gen Web link (all her work is sourced) and you might get some guff over the Google maps link, but I don't mind it. Since this draft originates with you, I wanted to run things by you first before anything was submitted. Granted, we don't WP:OWN any work, but I also want you to take a final look and do the honors. Seems only fair.

There are some additional local sourcing going back to early newspapers, but not much in terms of historical context; a bit of day-to-day happenings and plenty of obits. A surprising lack on the St. Ives church but online sleuthing can only take a person so far. Might be time to take a dive into some actual books!

But, it looks good to me and I thank you for beginning this article! Let me know if I can be of further help and welcome to the community!

Shortiefourten (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow! I didn't even know you were working on this! Thank you for editing the draft, it looks good and good job on finding sources on the history of the town! I'll go ahead and publish it, thanks for your contribution!

Bigfatman8766 (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, man, denied again! To me it passes WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND but I would suggest reaching out to @Stuartyeates via his talk page or maybe ping him here or at the Draft talk:Harmony, Washington page to centralize a discussion on the Harmony article.

Massive amount of articles mentioning Harmony for weddings, funerals, simple goings-on, land transactions, crimes, fishing reports, and road accidents...in newspapers going back to the 1890s. Standard fare for any community regardless of size. I've started a large, broad search on Harmony outside of what I recently added and it'll take some time to sift thru it all. I'm hoping there'll be more about its history, but small communities just struggle with that. If it isn't a big city, or some catastrophic event (natural or human), they just get passed over, time and time again.

But let's keep working this! Harmony exists, has existed, and seems like it's going to exist for a good amount of time to come. Hell, I've driven thru the town a half-dozen times when I go to relax at Ike Kinswa park - it's awesome!

Hope you don't mind me doing some work on the draft - not trying to "take over" at all - Lewis County is just my major area of interest as an editor. If you're planning on working on more rural areas around Lewis or Pierce, hell maybe even Thurston, reach out to me if I can help! But again, thanks so much for starting this draft.

Shortiefourten (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial work has been done on Draft:Harmony, Washington, and it would be entirely appropriate to resubmit it. I won't do anything else on it because the US isn't really my area of knowledge, and getting fresh eyes on it increases the chances of a expert being able to give you more specific advice. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Stuartyeates!

Really appreciate the feedback, your help, and advice. I've added a touch more today but outside of going to a library and bringing out the big books, I think it's as much as I can access. I'll reach out to @Bigfatman8766 to resubmit.

Shortiefourten (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bigfatman8766

Copied this over from my talk page - here - and this is all because of you, hoss. The credit belongs to you!

-----

Harmony, Washington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette^Edit! 14:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-----

I'm glad I could help! On a side note - if you felt I trampled on your efforts or took over...by no means was that my intention. Didn't want a good effort to be lost by a new editor, especially in an area that is of great interest to me. We need new blood and we here at Wiki need to recognize the value, and energy, that newer editors bring. I hope that the challenge to bring this article to life hasn't soured you. Please keep editing!

If you plan on adding further to existing articles on rural Western Washington, or creating some new ones, man...I can't wait! Reach out if you want to work together in the future!

All the best!

Shortiefourten (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harmony, Washington (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of this is indepth independent coverage of this place.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harmony, Washington and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shortiefourten :/ Bigfatman8766 (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bigfatman8766! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]