User talk:Billbaldwin2

Welcome

Hi, Billbaldwin2. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Major League Baseball teams by payroll in 2011. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bede

I've reverted your change to Bede. Bede's allegiance to Rome was significant in his discussion of the events leading up to the Synod of Whitby. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, Martin.

I understand your reasoning, but is allegiance to Rome really the issue? If Bede's allegiance had been to Constantinople at the time, that wouldn't have made him Eastern Orthodox. Nor would the Eastern Orthodox (to name one branch) agree that the Roman Catholic church was in existence at the time of Bede. From their perspective, Bede's allegiance was to the bishop of Rome in the holy Catholic church. I feel that "Christian" is the proper unbiased term that all sides can agree to. Billbaldwin2 (talk) 18:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bede was an apologist for Roman Christianity. See themes and bias for more information. Bede was an apologist for Rome. The Ecclesiatical History was finished less than 60 years after the Synod of Whitby and the History is in substantial part justification for the Roman Hegemony, see the background to Whitby. Whether it is called "Ionian" or "Celtic" Christianity is slightly irrelevant, the key point is that the native church did not accept the primacy of the Bishop of Rome and did not agree on liturgical matters (in particular the tonsure and the date of Easter). I'm not suggesting that Roman Catholics are not Christian, merely that they are Roman Catholics in contradistinction to Celtic or Ionian. Indeed, were there such a term, "Roman Christian" might be more appropriate. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]