User talk:Blutgretchen
Appearance
Welcome
[edit]
|
Discussion involving yourself
[edit]Dear Blutgretchen,
There is a discussion taking place on English Wikipedia (Talk:Eurovision Song Contest) in which you have been brought up in the discussion with an IP discrediting your personality and views on a matter regarding the Eurovision Song Contest winners map. I am making you aware of this, as I feel it is only fair that you should know when fellow Wikipedian's, including unregistered editors, make negative comments against people. Wes Mᴥuse 13:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- OK...but I don't care. Basically I see no sense in these type of maps. In my opinion, the discussion is a waste of time. I don't see any problematical discrediting of my personality or negative comments. I am no Sissy. --Blutgretchen (talk) 21:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- In a way I agree that the map is useless really. All it does is look "decorative". The article itself details the winning tallies, so why a map is also needed to so a visual aspect is beyond my comprehension. I always thought Wikipedia rather we wrote in prose if decoration served as a distraction? Wes Mouse | T@lk 21:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, I never intended to "discredit your personality", and I barely understand what the problem even is. Sorry that you got caught in the spray. Happy editing!-91.10.62.211 (talk) 22:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- And now the IP has resorted to stalking my contributions in order to cause more distress. Seriously!? Wes Mouse | T@lk 22:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Stop it now. Like I wrote above, I see no discrediting of my personality at all, so I agree with the IP more than with you. What I don't like - no matter if it is in real life or online - are squealers. --Blutgretchen (talk) 22:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- And now the IP has resorted to stalking my contributions in order to cause more distress. Seriously!? Wes Mouse | T@lk 22:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, I never intended to "discredit your personality", and I barely understand what the problem even is. Sorry that you got caught in the spray. Happy editing!-91.10.62.211 (talk) 22:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- In a way I agree that the map is useless really. All it does is look "decorative". The article itself details the winning tallies, so why a map is also needed to so a visual aspect is beyond my comprehension. I always thought Wikipedia rather we wrote in prose if decoration served as a distraction? Wes Mouse | T@lk 21:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
EOD --Blutgretchen (talk) 22:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)