User talk:Bmdavll

Welcome!

Hello, Bmdavll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Redwolf24 9 July 2005 03:06 (UTC)

Finding copyright violations

It's usually pretty simple. First of all, the complete lack of formatting in that article made it look like an obvious cut-and-paste job. From there, I cut-and-paste an entire sentence or two into Google, put quote marks around the sentence(s), and search. (If you don't use the quote marks, Google will treat each word of the sentence independently). Cheers, Jasmol 00:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you for your work reverting vanadlism, including CSD's! xaosflux ^T/_C 02:40, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

journal-stub

Appreciate the notice, but it will need to be fixed. The consensus was that if created, it should include journals for all academic disciplines, not just those for science with a possible later split into sub types. Caerwine 06:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see you agree with the proposed fix. However, there is no need to volunteer for a simple restubbing all articles from one template to another template. The project does have a bot available that can do that. Manual edits are really only needed when splitting a stub type. Caerwine 06:56, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy

Good question.

The species lists in family etc type articles are mainly based on the on-line lists from Handbook of Birds of the World. NAm and GB follow AOU and BOU respectively, and most of the other regional/country lists follow Avibase's Clements version, if only because I created most of them. For greatest consistency, I'd recommend Clements. Asian birds sounds like a major task, I found list of birds of the Indian subcontinent a major task!

jimfbleak 13:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at your list, which is a real achievement. One problem is that Avibase uses many Americanised names even for Old World species, and also uses wierd hyphenated forms, so there are many links like Gray Heron, Gray Partridge and American Golden-Plover which need redirecting or changing to the more accepted names for these species. Jim

I've fixed a few more links either by name changes or redirects. These have basically been ones where I know the article exists, so I am sure that there are still some red links that need fixing. Jim

Thanks for reverting my userpage

Thanks a lot. It's always glad to know that there are people like you watching for bad edits. Cheers, Ingoolemo ^talk 16:49, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, by the way, it seems that you've written a Javascript rollback tool. You might be interested in altering the links to the vandal from linking to the userpage to the contributions page. Good luck, Ingoolemo ^talk 19:29, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup

I was JUST about to revert that vandalism, thanks for doing it.... very strange vandaliser. Gryffindor 23:29, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Munich Frauenkirche, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Welcome to the Welcoming Committee

I see you've created a fancy welcome template that automatically mentions new users' contributions. That's a good way to make your welcomes more personal. Keep up the good work. --Tantalum T e lluride 00:16, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BD2412's RFA

Thanks, Bmdavll, for supporting my RfA - I'll do my best as an admin to help make the dream of Wikipedia into a reality! BD2412 T 21:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you still around? BD2412 T 22:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Chinese ivory carving.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chinese ivory carving.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 05:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Anacapri cliff.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Blue Mountains overhang.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Blue Mountains Three Sisters.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]