User talk:Bobe8q8661

Welcome!

Hello, Bobe8q8661, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Bobe8q8661, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Johnj1995 (talk) 17:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bobe8q8661

A tag has been placed on User:Bobe8q8661 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because it contains information about someone.

Ok Bobe8q8661 (talk) 17:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Winter Vacation in India (December 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobe8q8661! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2021 Winter Vacation in India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:2021 Winter Vacation in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://trendienewz.com/delhi-school-closed-all-schools-and-colleges-in-delhi-closed-the-threat-of-omicron-deepens/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your edit to Kali Yuga has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2021-22 Winter Vacation in India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:2021-22 Winter Vacation in India, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film) (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 14:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Manja (kite) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to CoWIN has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chala Mussaddi... Office Office, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film), you may be blocked from editing. Stop removing the AFC comments. You've been told this once. Don't domit again. Ravensfire (talk) 13:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film) (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 17:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it used in your above draft that was declined, the reason is non-free images are not allowed in drafts. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth without a source

Please don't make edits where you add date/place of birth without a source as you did here [1]. You CANNOT add a "citation needed" tag, you MUST include a source for personal details like that, for WP:BLPPRIVACY reasons. Please don't ever do something like that again. If you don't have a reliable source (and don't use scraper sites like starsunfolded, use reputable news sites), don't add the information. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry, but actually I found the data via wikipedia itself while google searched it. But for unknown reason, it is not showing "inside" wikipedia page. Go and check yourself. And I used "citation needed" so that any admin may look this issue and solve it. The same issue happens here:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vrajesh_Hirjee

Thank you Bobe8q8661 (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia CANNOT be used as a source, ever. If you googled the answer you better provide the source that Google got that info from cause a Google Search result also cannot be used as a source. I highly suggest you read WP:BLP. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has a lot of rules, Bobe8q8661, and those of us who've been editing here for a while know that newer editors aren't as familiar and will make edits that probably shouldn't be made. Talk page messages like this (even warnings) are just a way to help you understand and learn those rules, and improve as an editor. The WP:BLP that Blaze Wolf called out is one of the key policies - it's short for Biographies of Living Persons, but really applies anywhere you talk about someone that's alive (or recently passed). Information in articles can have an impact on that person, so Wikipedia articles need to make sure that personal information always has a reference to a good source. You can't just do a google search and take any result, it needs to be from a reliable source. Scraper sites (starsunfolded, wikibio, celebrityborn) should never be used. Sticking with reputable news sites is always a good thing, and asking at WP:RSN or WT:ICTF is a good option. Ravensfire (talk) 18:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft review comments

Please don't remove the AFC comments from draft articles as you did here - [2]. There's an HTML comment on them saying "Do not remove" for a reason. They were restored once after you earlier deleted them, don't keep doing that. Ravensfire (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look at your talk page and read what people are saying or you will most likely be blocked. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film) (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no indication of notability. Sources appear to be self or promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Ballad of Sandeep (2011 Short film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 17:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhoot and Friends (2010 film) (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ts12rAc were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhoot and Friends (2010 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bhoot and Friends (2010 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 19:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mark (video game) (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:NGAME.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mark (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Mark (video game), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicken Invaders: The Next Wave (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:NGAME

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicken Invaders: The Next Wave and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chicken Invaders: The Next Wave, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive fan editing

A lot of your edits are bordering on disruption, with a focus on fan edits to fictional content, such as items from Half-Life. Please do not continue. This type of content is not suitable for Wikipedia. If it's the type of content you wish to work on you may have better luck at Fandom or Gamepedia. -- ferret (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhool Bhulaiyaa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Fiwec81618. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 New York City Subway attack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fiwec81618 (talk) 04:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 New York City Subway attack

Please read WP:BLP from beginning to end, with a special focus on WP:BLPCRIME. Then read Richard Jewell. High-profile crime pages like 2022 New York City Subway attack are read by lots of people. You have to get it right the first time. "Person of interest" does not mean "suspect" does not mean "accused" does not mean "convicted". If you're unsure about any source, if you're unsure about anything, just leave it out. No harm comes from a missing field in an infobox. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yippee (noodles) (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing more than an advertorial.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yippee (noodles) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yippee (noodles), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 18:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Your edit to Draft:Yippee (noodles) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 15:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding your connection to another account

Hi Bobe8q8661. I'm Tamzin, and I'm an administrator and SPI clerk here on Wikipedia. I wanted to inquire about the relationship between your account and TriMain182681 (talk · contribs). Do you operate both of these accounts, or do you have any other connection to TriMain182681? Please do not edit further until you answer this message. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 06:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the other account is my relative's account who is new on Wikipedia. Hope this answer will satisfy you. If you want to ask or know more about this, please ask/reply asap.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobe8q8661 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask why the two of you are editing so many of the same pages, so close together? Why did your relative tag Draft:Yippee (noodles) for deletion, as "author's request", when you are the author? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 06:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my mistake. Actually, I send the draft's link to him to read my draft. But, told him to put "deletion tag" because I want to delete it. But, then I realized that only author has right to delete. So, I soon edit it with my "own" account. Hope, it will solve your query. Anything else, then please ask. Thank you sir/mam.

We both are editing same pages because I am teaching him "how to use Wikipedia?", as he is new, he did many mistakes and I am correcting it. Hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobe8q8661 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And why did he create Draft:Yippee (noodle) on the same topic? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 06:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because I don't want to proceed that draft further (that's why I deleted it). I told him to read and re-create your "own" draft of same topic/name if he "wants". Another query, please ask. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobe8q8661 (talk • contribs) 06:45, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you and your cousin live together? (Also, please sign and indent your posts.) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 06:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, not together. Separate homes. Now, may I ask that why you asked this question? How does it related to your "original" question. Please reply. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobe8q8661 (talk • contribs) 07:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I asked because what you are describing may potentially violate our policy against using multiple accounts. Knowing if the two of you live together is important for making that determination. Also, again, please follow WP:SIGN and WP:THREAD. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think you are pretty satisfied now. May I delete my draft as he also refused to work on my draft and also he is wanting to delete his "own" draft of same topic. May I proceed? Bobe8q8661 (talk) 07:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If TriMain182681 can come here and affirm that he does not want to work on the draft anymore, and you both agree to not submit any further drafts about this product, yes, I will delete it. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:44, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I does not want to work on the draft. Please proceed deletion process. TriMain182681 (talk) 07:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I've deleted the draft, on the understanding that if either of you changes your mind, you will request to restore this draft, rather than create a new one. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 08:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir/mam from both of us. TriMain182681 (talk) 08:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobe8q8661. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 09:49, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sonal Kaushal (Voice actress).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sonal Kaushal (Voice actress).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of programmes broadcast by Sony YAY!

Hello, Bobe8q8661. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of programmes broadcast by Sony YAY!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Mark (video game)

Hello, Bobe8q8661. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Mark (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Banned

As per WP:3X, this user is considered banned by community consensus. No admin may unilaterally lift the block. Note that the user has continued to engage in block evasion since the last report (at the time of writing) in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobe8q8661/Archive. -- Yamla (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Notable incidents caused by Manja (kite)

Hello, Bobe8q8661. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Notable incidents caused by Manja (kite), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Mark (video game)

Hello, Bobe8q8661. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Mark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chicken Invaders: The Next Wave

Hello, Bobe8q8661. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chicken Invaders: The Next Wave, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chicken Invaders: The Next Wave

Hello, Bobe8q8661. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chicken Invaders: The Next Wave".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of programmes broadcast by Sony YAY!

Hello, Bobe8q8661. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of programmes broadcast by Sony YAY!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mumbai Gullies poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mumbai Gullies poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]