User talk:Botterweg14
|
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bin Tepe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 11:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Regarding deletion of reference in Greek Dark Ages article
[edit]You deleted the reference of the following text: "Around this time, large-scale revolts took place in several parts of the eastern Mediterranean. Attempts to overthrow existing kingdoms were made as a result of economic and political instability by surrounding people, who were already plagued with famine and hardship." I did not put that text in the article, it was another editor, but I found the source recently and I decided to place it there anyway. Of course that source is not too reliable, but it's the only source. So putting "citation needed" tag is useless as there is no other source as far as I know. Maybe the solution is to change all the phrase and find a new reference. --Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B. (talk) 03:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for your reply. If the only source that supports that text isn't reliable, that would be reason to simply remove the text. I do think the article would benefit from a characterization of the LBA/EIA transition, and for that you might look at recent(ish) work by Guy Middleton and Oliver Dickinson. (I might eventually do so myself but I'm short on time at the moment.) Botterweg14 (talk) 16:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Bin Tepe you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bin Tepe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homogeneity and heterogeneity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assertion.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Glossa Psycholinguistics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 07:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Semantics and Pragmatics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 07:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Glossa Psycholinguistics for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossa Psycholinguistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Randykitty (talk) 14:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Semantics and Pragmatics for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantics and Pragmatics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.