User talk:BoyBoom/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:BoyBoom. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
ThisGuyIsGreat, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi ThisGuyIsGreat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC) |
2015–16 Austrian Football Bundesliga
Hi, may I ask why you reverted me without any explanation when I added standard template for league tables? Qed237 (talk) 22:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Im sorry, I saw a big deletion. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, ThisGuyIsGreat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Qed237 (talk) 22:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, thank you, you can help with a problem that I have with another account Riesories (talk) 03:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
What about your other account? If it is blocked or banned, I can not do anything about that, only administrators can. Next time, create a new section for this. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 13:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Tim witherspoon
Thanks for keeping it it is fact but I know a lot of problems when people delete fact by accident and when people don't detect vandalism Sotoeoejsj (talk) 00:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC) Hello. I just wanted to let you know, that you appear to have made a mistake. I never edited that article. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 00:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC) Ohh I know you said on my talk page about it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sotoeoejsj (talk • contribs) 20:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge | |
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. | |
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!
|
Thank you for the welcome!
Just wanted to say thank you for the warm welcome, the links are very helpful. (I also wanted to practice writing on someone else's talk page if you don't mind)
I do have one question about photo rights. I've written to a couple of people asking for permission to use their photos, and so far both have said yes. I've then upload the photo for usage, but I'm not sure what to do about licensing. I have express permission from the photo's author, but I have no knowledge of the proper license. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks! EmilioDiegoGarcia (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, I was not really sure about this, so I asked at a place called the Teahouse. The Teahouse is a place on Wikipedia where you can ask questions, and other users can answer them. In advance, if you ever have a question, I recommend asking there, as you should have an answer in the course of an hour. I will let you know when your question gets answered, and will tell you the answer. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, here is your answer. Read this. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- @ThisGuyIsGreat: Thank you very much! I will keep this in mind when adding photos to Wikipedia. EmilioDiegoGarcia (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Trout right back at you ;)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: whacking me with a minnow instead of a whale XD
Thanks for the good humor! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 19:46, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of MafiaScum
Hello ThisGuyIsGreat,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MafiaScum for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 20:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
- Op-ed: Je ne suis pas Google
- News and notes: VisualEditor, endowment, science, and news in brief
- WikiProject report: Meet the boilerplate makers
- Traffic report: Mrityorma amritam gamaya...
- Featured content: Maya, Michigan, Medici, Médée, and Moul n'ga
The Signpost: 12 August 2015
- News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA
- In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event
- Traffic report: Fighting from top to bottom
- Featured content: Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Blog: The Hunt for Tirpitz
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
- In focus: An increase in active Wikipedia editors
- In the media: Russia temporarily blocks Wikipedia
- News and notes: Re-imagining grants
- Featured content: Out to stud, please call later
- Arbitration report: Reinforcing Arbitration
- Recent research: OpenSym 2015 report
The Signpost: 02 September 2015
- Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flow placed on ice
- Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments
- Featured content: Brawny
- In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
- Traffic report: You didn't miss much
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 09 September 2015
- Gallery: Being Welsh
- Featured content: Killed by flying debris
- News and notes: The Swedish Wikipedia's controversial two-millionth article
- Traffic report: Mass media production traffic
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 16 September 2015
- Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access
- News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?
- In the media: Is there life on Mars?
- Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?
- Traffic report: Another week
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Co-op mentorship
Hi ThisGuyIsGreat, welcome (again) to Wikipedia. I'm Yunshui, and I've been assigned as your mentor by the Wikipedia Co-op project. I don't know whether I can teach you everything, but I can probably show you a fair bit - where do you want to start? Yunshui 雲水 08:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Yunshui. Maybe we could start with some stuff on how to write articles and be a good writer? Is that ok with you? ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 17:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, let's talk article writing. There are three main guiding principles to bear in mind when you're writing for Wikipedia, with a fourth thrown into the mix if you're creating an article from scratch. These are as follows:
- Verifiability. I'm not sure this was even a word until Wikipedia coined it, but now it's a fundamental element of writing Wikipedia content. Verifiability means that every bit of factual information you add to Wikipedia needs to be supported by citations. In other words, you can't just write, "Elbows are the bendy bits in the middle of your arms"; you need to cite at least one source which talks about elbows, their bendiness, and their location in your arms. I'm being a bit flippant here, but hopefully you get the idea. Read the full policy for the details, but that pretty much covers the gist of it.
- Reliablity. Not all the sources you could cite, however, are created equal. Wikipedia has some basic standards of sourcing, to avoid the encyclopedia filling up with tabloid journalism and quotes from Time Cube. In the example above, if you have a choice between citing Dr Susan Smith MD, Joints of the human body: a bio-mechanical atlas of the human skeletal structure, Elsevier, 2013 on the one hand, and a forum posting by Contributor:BillyLuvzCheez which states, "elbows be in u arms lol", it should be fairly obvious which is more likely to meet Wikipedia's requirements. The basic rule of thumb is: sources must be published, must have some level of professional editorial oversight, and must not be polemical. Again, read the policy for the nitty-gritty.
- Neutrality. Wikipedia doesn't take sides. We aim to report balanced, factual information (whether we always succeed is a matter of some debate, but that's the theory). As such, your writing needs to remain neutral: avoid excessive adjectives (indeed, avoid adjectives in general), don't exaggerate or extrapolate from what the source say, report the information without bias. This is difficult to do; I've been writing for Wikipedia for a while (article number 200 will hopefully be up by the end of the summer) and I still sometimes find myself being a little over-enthusiastic about my subject matter.
- Plus, if you're writing a completely new article, you need to also consider:
- Notability. Wikipedia doesn't have, nor does it aim to have, an article about everything that's ever existed. Instead, we want articles about notable subjects, and that means they need to have (memorise this next bit, it's like the mantra of Wikipedia) "significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The best explanation of this that I know of is here; take a look.
- Once you understand verifiability, reliability, neutrality and notability as they apply to Wikipedia, you're well on your way to writing excellent encyclopedic articles. Yunshui 雲水 17:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, that really helped. Can you help me out with all of the technical terms? Thats my main goal of this, figure out the crazy amount of technical stuff at Wikipedia. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Sure; what technical terminology were you struggling with? As a (very loose) rule of thumb, if you come across a term on Wikipedia which you don't understand, try putting it into the Search bar prefaced with "WP:". For example, searching for "WP:Notability" will take you straight to WP:Notability. Even if the term isn't exact, you may well get a drop down menu of other options that might help.
- The "WP:" incidentally, is a shortcut code for "Wikipedia namespace" (putting "Wikipedia:" in front of your search term will work in the same way). Pages prefaced with "Wikipedia:" are in the Project namespace, just as pages preceded with "Talk:" are in the Talk namespace and pages preceded with "User" are in the User namespace - you get the idea. Wikipedia has a number of different namespaces; the only one without such a prefix is the Article namespace (usually called "mainspace"), which is where the main body of the encyclopedia lives. For more information on namespaces, see - unsurprisingly - WP:NAMESPACE. Yunshui 雲水 13:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for that, the specific area is links and stuff, that's the part I am struggling with. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Links are pretty easy to understand, so that's a bonus. Basically there are three types of link you'll come across:
- Wikilinks Wikilinks take the reader to another page within Wikipedia. You create them by putting double square brackets around a term; thus
[[Apple]]
give you a wikilink to the page Apple. These are the most common links you'll find on Wikipedia. Wikilinks can also be piped to change the text they display; thus[[Apple|Banana]]
still links to Apple but displays as Banana. Wikilinks can also go to non-article pages within Wikipedia: User:Yunshui is a wikilink, for example. - External links External links go to other websites - reference sections are the most common place you'll see these. To create an external link, use single square brackets and be sure to include the "http://". Thus,
[http://facebook.com]
is how you would create a link to Facebook (which would look like this: [1]). To change how external links display, put the display text after a space, so[http://facebook.com A popular social media site]
comes out as A popular social media site. - Interwikilinks These are pretty unusual; they are links from Wikipedia to another Wikimedia project (which includes other language versions of Wikipedia). They work like wikilinks, but require a project code as the preface.
[[fr:Pomme]]
, for example, will take you to the French (fr) Wikipedia entry fr:Pomme.
- Wikilinks Wikilinks take the reader to another page within Wikipedia. You create them by putting double square brackets around a term; thus
- Does that help? Yunshui 雲水 17:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes, thank you very much. Are you ok with covering things such as templates, categories, and shortcuts? ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Whoops, haven't been back here in a while, sorry. For templates, have a read of User:Yunshui/Templates for beginners (although I do need to overhaul that essay sometime). As for categories and shortcuts, what would you like to know? Yunshui 雲水 14:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 September 2015
- In the media: PETA makes "monkey selfie" a three-way copyright battle; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Featured content: Inside Duke Humfrey's Library
- WikiProject report: Dancing to the beat of a... wikiproject?
- Traffic report: ¡Viva la Revolución! Kinda.
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
In case you didn't notice…
Just in case you didn't notice, the message at the top of my article and on the article talk page says "Please do not rush to mark this page for deletion". I am the WikiMan (Click here to contact me!) 02:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Not to pile on, but please slow down. I just created Joseph Horsfall Johnson and I am adding another reference now. Perhaps you could discuss before rushing to delete things? Jonathunder (talk) 00:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I didnt speedy deletion, this is AFD, if some other users think it should be kept, it will be. You can go to the page and say you need more time and vote keep. Just letting you know. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not new here. I know how that works. Please take a look at my history. Jonathunder (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, Calm down sir, I don't think I'm allowed to remove the template now, if that's what your thinking. I'm trying to do my best.
ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 01:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- I'm calm, and I'm not worried about the article being deleted. We were all new once, and I won't bite you. Jonathunder (talk) 01:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
AFD - Speedy Keep
Hi ThisGuyIsGreat, I've closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Horsfall Johnson as Speedy Keep as you've not provided a valid reason - "Way too short, and not very noteworthy" is obviously not a valid reason to nominate an article,
In future please read WP:AFD and you might wanna read & follow WP:BEFORE too,
Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 02:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Radical Rappelling: 3 October 2015
I don't see why you think this article should be deleted. I think this is a matter of your personal opinion. It is not written for promotional purposes. I can see millions of other wikipedia articles written up for games. This doesn't make any sense. I am definitely going to protest this further if it is deleted. Looking at your history, it looks like you have a history of rushing to delete things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omegodriver (talk • contribs) 00:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Sup
Lol I see you a lot in the forums. Had no idea you were on here. CocoaPuff310 (talk) 00:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- School started, so I have not been able to play Kongregate a lot lately :( ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 00:18, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ah that sucks, I feel you bro. CocoaPuff310 (talk) 00:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
- Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?
- Tech news: Tech news in brief
May I enquire as to your basis for reverting my recent edit at the above page? John from Idegon (talk) 01:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
John from Idegon (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
John from Idegon (talk) 01:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gaither High School. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 02:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gaither High School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
- Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption
- Traffic report: Reality is for losers
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Proposed deletion of Super Bowl LIIII
The article Super Bowl LIIII has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amortias (T)(C) 20:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:Super Bowl LIIII
Draft:Super Bowl LIIII, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Super Bowl LIIII and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Super Bowl LIIII during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 01:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note You can ignore this notice, unfortunately, Twinkle shot it to you as the page mover, rather than to the actual creator of the page. Safiel (talk) 01:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of 2015-2016 NBA Finals
The article 2015-2016 NBA Finals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:CRYSTAL; no sources given to indicate coverage of this future event
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The database size lists have been updated. These control special page update frequency and which wikis use global abuse filters. [2]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 13. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 14. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 15 (calendar).
- You will be able to upload images to Wikimedia Commons using the visual editor. When the image is uploaded it will be added to the article you're editing. [3]
- Pages that show citation error messages will automatically be placed in a hidden category. [4]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 13 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi––removed WP:OR only. Please review again. 68.175.110.172 (talk) 02:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
- WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States
- News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate
- Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death
- Featured content: A fistful of dollars
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Tech News is trying to make reading the newsletter easier. The icon means the item is in the newsletter every week, but with new dates. The icon means the item is mainly relevant for readers with technical knowledge. You can leave feedback on this change.
- Timestamps in the protection log will now be in the user's timezone. Previously they would show Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). [5]
Problems
- A problem with MediaWiki made some pages show no content on October 14. This has now been fixed. [6]
- Some templates were misplaced in the Flow description bar. This could make it impossible to click on links. This will be fixed this week. [7]
- The deployment of the new MediaWiki version was stopped on October 14. No new code was deployed for the rest of week. This meant planned changes did not happen. [8]
Changes this week
- Changes that were planned to happen last week will happen this week. [9]
- Wikispecies, Meta and MediaWiki.org will be able to use Wikidata for sitelinks. [10][11][12][13]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 20 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Question.
What did i do wrong? because i didn't really do anything to anybody. AOzz101x (Talk)
You were insulting pikmin, not using neutral points of view, and broke about 5 different rules of Wikipedia.
2: Not using a Neutral Points of Views? what am i doing wrong that broke this? 3: what rules did i break? if you mean undid edits by IP users, i had reason why i have done that is because they didnt have any sources to backup stuff . i've follow everything else,
you can even look at my Contributions and no where on there have me insulting the user "Pigmin". or anything of me breaking the rules. Aozz101x (Talk)
THE ARTICLE ABOUT PIKMIN VIDEO GAMES ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 23:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
I didn't do anything wrong on Pikmin Video Game Article, what i did was undid IP's vandalism, that was it. how does undid IP of doing vandalism, break the rules or Natural of Points, or even an insult? i was trying help, not doing anything wrong at all. if i did something wrong, then i apologias for it. user:Aozz101x (Talk)
Reversal of edit
Hi, why was my edit on the Julian Shapiro article reverted? 2601:646:4101:A1D3:41:2015:EAFD:579F (talk) 01:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
You took out WAY too much info. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
- Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"
- Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus
- Featured content: A more balanced week
- Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing
- Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 27. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 28. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 29 (calendar).
- The first time you use the visual editor, pop-ups will explain why and when you should use the citation and link tools. [14]
- You will be able to upload images to Wikimedia Commons from inside the wikitext editor by clicking "Upload" in the "Insert file" dialog. You will also be able to drag and drop them into an article when using the visual editor. [15][16]
- When you edit a code block in visual editor, you will have the syntax highlighted. [17][18]
- Index and Page namespaces on Wikisource will be defined as content namespaces in
$wgContentNamespaces
. [19]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 2016-17 NBA season
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 2016-17 NBA season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now see how many editors are using a gadget on a wiki on Special:GadgetUsage. [20]
- If you are using the mobile version of Wikipedia, you can now see Wikidata descriptions under article titles in search results. [21]
- Editing conflicts are now detected when you edit on a mobile device. Before, this did not work properly on mobile. [22]
Problems
- On October 26 the Wikimedia sites went down for ten minutes. [23]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 3. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 4. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 5 (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 3 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join. You can also read the latest VisualEditor newsletter.
Future changes
- A help link will be added to Special:Search. Administrators might have to update the MediaWiki:Search-summary message to avoid two help links. [24]
- Empty list items could be allowed in the future. If so, this could affect some templates. [25]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Paul W. Kruse has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DanielRigal (talk) 00:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone
- In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?
- Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad
- Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Proposed deletion of Fantasy genius
The article Fantasy genius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)