User talk:Brando130
Archives |
---|
Aram (Biblical region)
[edit]Hi. The problem is that Rktect is doing this to quite a few articles, ie posting OR. He's been banned from certain types of articles for this sort of thing. See what he just put on the talk page of Battle of Kadesh, what do you make of it? Doug Weller (talk) 16:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Republic of New Afrika
[edit]I notice some of the changes you made to the Republic of New Afrika article and want to help improve it, but haven't learned how to use Wikipedia effectively (yet). Are you the person who left the "white power" message??
My intent is to help make the article more accurate and informative (as time allows) and to minimize acts of vandalism.
One particular item that needs attention is placing the correct RNA flag in the article. The RNA flag is not the same flag the Marcus Garvey popularized!
There are, of course, other matters that need to be dealt with... and I will get to them as I learn more.
Tunis (talk) 11:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The file File:Sadi carnot from 1894 newspaper.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)