User talk:Breich9

Interesting

Interesting article on the Hammond Gazette. I've added some sources and resubmitted it for review; hopefully it is accepted. I've written a few articles on papers, though mostly minority papers, because that is what I am interested in - where your focus is on Maryland, mine is Nebraska, see Pokrok Západu, Western Post, Enterprise, etc. If you ever need a hand, just reach out and I can try to assist! I think it's important for us to have a good collection of articles on pretty much all newspapers; if we ever end up citing them or mentioning them, it's inconvenient for readers to not have access to an overview of their place in history. Urve (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll definitely keep that in mind going forward (There's still a lot I'm learning regarding the editing process). I appreciate you reaching out! Breich9 (talk) 13:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I accepted the Hammond Gazette article after finding an interesting chapter in a book devoted to it. Best of luck on your other projects :) Urve (talk) 02:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, greatly appreciated! I've been searching my library's Maryland history section myself and have been able to find references to handful of relevant papers, so I should be adding those soon. Thanks again for the help! Breich9 (talk) 13:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katholische Volkszeitung (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only the first sentence has any citations. Where is the rest of the information from? Citing those sources may show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katholische Volkszeitung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Republican (Oakland, Maryland) (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need several in-depth sources about this paper to show it meets notability criteria. Finding them regarding 19th century papers is going to be a bear. Add into that the common name "The Republican", which is going to give you thousands of hits about other subjects not related to the subject. The LoC and the history are good refs. If you could come up with one more, that would work. Feel free to ping me if you find one and add it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Republican (Oakland, Maryland) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Katholische Volkszeitung

Hello, Breich9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Katholische Volkszeitung, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Katholische Volkszeitung

Hello, Breich9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Katholische Volkszeitung".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Republican (Oakland, Maryland)

Hello, Breich9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Republican (Oakland, Maryland), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Republican (Oakland, Maryland)

Hello, Breich9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Republican".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]