User talk:BrisJanner

January 2023

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scunthorpe United F.C. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Home Park, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 02:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Roy Gardner (businessman). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Screw you he nearly killed my club. BrisJanner (talk) 03:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred BrisJanner (talk) 03:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fan board. —C.Fred (talk) 03:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Regarding your recent edits (and comments made in edit summaries), I would invite you to please read WP:BURDEN. It is your responsibility to find references that support the edits that you are making to Wikipedia, not the job of other editors. — Manti core 03:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrisJanner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm from Plymouth, I know what I'm on about, your editors who can't even point out Plymouth on a map of Devon are Constantly u doing everything without any fact backing their edits either, get it sorted. It's not one rule for one, one for another

Decline reason:

And the rules include WP:Reliable sources and WP:Biographies of living people. You cannot make unfounded accusations against the subjects of articles. —C.Fred (talk) 16:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BrisJanner (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrisJanner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Aslo you've blocked me for calling out these "top editors" for not providing any evidence or proof themselves, why are they not blocked either? I will tell you, the only reason they have reported me is because they can't stand being wrong, that's it, a real shame, a website designed to be edited by people who know what they're on about is bei g ran by big egod editors without a clue

Decline reason:

You are clearly demonstrating the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not declining both of these requests, but you may want to retract and resubmit this second one before another admin does decline this one, since it utterly fails to address your conduct, which led to your block. —C.Fred (talk) 16:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) It's not a good idea to complain about other editors in your unblock request. Remember you were blocked because of your actions not the actions of others. For more information read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks plus the section about talking about yourself and not others. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 23:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not retracting anything I've said, you all need to get laid, @Manticore, if you're not from Plymouth and admit I have local knowledge, stop editing pages you know nothing about, you ask for charity yet you're all a bunch of self egod belters. BrisJanner (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]