User talk:Brodyargo

Brodyargo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Brodyargo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frontier Groove, Inc.

The article Frontier Groove, Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article that doesn't indicate how this company is notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Bone

Hi! Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Bone and note that the consensus there was to not have a standalone article, but to merge relevant content to United States presidential election debates, 2016#Second presidential debate (Washington University in St. Louis). So please don't keep restoring the article, as that would be seen as going against the community consensus. If you wish to challenge that consensus, the place to do so is at WP:DRV. Thanks! Crow^Caw 18:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Twenty One Pilots. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Go check my sandbox! Brodyargo (talk) 17:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP Block

All of my edits are constructive, and this IP is where I make all of my edits.

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Brodyargo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "DEATH120". The reason given for DEATH120's block is: "Vandalism-only account; see also filter log".

Blocking administrator: Oshwah (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: I can't see any reason to believe you are related to the vandal, DEATH120. Yamla (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Regardless of how frustrated you are, you cannot make personal attacks against other editors, even in your userspace. Please remember to remain civil and follow dispute resolution if you find yourself in a dispute with other editors.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I swear to god this dispute is what is going to get me blocked for the fifth time. Brodyargo (talk)

Well that's certainly an illuminating comment given this account has never been blocked. Is there any reason you shouldn't be blocked for abuse of multiple accounts and block evasion given Bradyargo and Bradyargo1?--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As hard as it may be to believe this, which I know you won't, Brady Argo is actually my brother. He's a dick who vandalizes wikipedia fo the fun of it. About a year ago I was a wikipedia vandal myself because I had nothing better to do. So, now I make minor edits for fun and to help the community. I'm sorry for being a prick and I won't do it again. Brodyargo (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brodyargo/sandbox

I hate to break it to you but posting the scripts of Hollywood films on the internet is actually illegal and we don't allow it here. Even if that wasn't the case posting something like that isn't an appropriate use of your userspace - it isn't your own personal web host, it's intended for development of new content for the encyclopedia. I've been called a lot worse here but I strongly suggest that if you want to carry on editing Wikipedia you don't insult people for doing something you don't like. Hut 8.5 20:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I apologize for what I said. Brodyargo (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Temple of the Dog#Discography instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This discography is too short to justify having it on a separate page. The discography in the Temple of the Dog article is sufficient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Brodyargo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Linkin Park New Logo 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Linkin Park New Logo 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brodyargo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brodyargo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]