User talk:BrokenWall3

Welcome!

Hello BrokenWall3, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Drake Dawson (talk) 04:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Quit reverting things without at least an explanation of what you are doing. — Status {^talk_contribs 06:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll give an explanation. BrokenWall3 (talk) 03:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, Performing Live was not a tour. Tours visit more than one place. Both 21 Nights and Performing Live are revues. Second, "The Earth Tour" is not in the name, per his official website and other media outlets. It's simply "21 Nights in London". Lastly, Prince 20Ten is the name of the tour. This is per the tour's official poster. — Status {^talk_contribs 05:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I've explained to you why. — Status {^talk_contribs 22:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but I also explained why I did those edits. BrokenWall3 (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I told you why they were incorrect. — Status {^talk_contribs 22:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prince performed 40 shows for Per4ming Live 3121 and 21 shows for 21 Nights in London: The Earth Tour. They are tours. BrokenWall3 (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I told you, tours take place in more than one place. Both of those took place at only one venue. A revue. — Status {^talk_contribs 23:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

An article should not be used by manually copying its contents to a different title, because this destroys the page's history. If you believe that the article should indeed be moved (I don't know which is the correct name of the song), please list it at requested moves. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=17443529 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Lotusflower (album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crystal Ball (album set). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 06:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Are you just going to complain and revert about all the edits I do? BrokenWall3 (talk) 06:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would it hurt to justify your changes? Or even to explain all of them? Your edits also have changes to infobox fields, dubious links, etc. Unexplained. Your edit to Crystal Ball (album set) was reverted. In a content dispute, the discussion is moved to the talk page, here. Dan56 (talk) 06:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Crystal Ball (album set). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 06:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. You're already threatening me to block me. BrokenWall3 (talk) 06:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Valleys of Neptune, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 06:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's just no pleasing you. BrokenWall3 (talk) 06:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KopJ for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dan56 (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of multiple accounts to evade a block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the talk apge of your first account: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]