User talk:Brookford

Anspach family

Hi I’m just reviewing this article you created. I’m afraid should probably have stayed in draft for the time being. There aren’t sufficient sources at the moment to show that the family as a whole is notable. In addition you’ve listed people in the article who certainly share a common surname, but whether they are all members of the same family is not sourced either. I suggest you either expand the references or take the article back into draft. All the best Mccapra (talk) 07:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mccapra and thank you for your message. Regarding the notability of the family, an article was written about them in the Parchemin, which is published by the Genealogical and Heraldic Office of Belgium which was already cited on WP. I have added an article in the Libre Belgique, one of the main French language newspapers in Belgium which writes about the castle of the famous Anspach family "château de la célèbre famille Anspach". I have also added links to an online family tree that links all the people mentioned. Although the links were already made in the Parchemin article but it is not readable online. I hope it will be enough. Best regards, --Brookford (talk) 15:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks I’ll take a look. Mccapra (talk) 15:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Brookford

Thank you for creating Anspach family.

User:Mccapra, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for adding in additional references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mccapra (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit at Selene

Hi. I've undone your edit at Selene. While what you wrote seems certainly plausible, can you please provide sources? Thanks. Paul August ☎ 19:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul August, thanks for your message. I have added a few sources. --Brookford (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the sources. I think they are more than sufficient for the identification in the of the two side figures on the altar piece as Phosphorus and Hesperus, although both the Louvre web cite, and Clarac mention alternatives: the Dioscuri (Louvre), and "les génies de cet astre" (Clarac, p. 341), so perhaps the identification in the caption needs to be qualified. Also, of course sources in english would be better, if possible. However, while I don't have ready access to Bouillon, I see nowhere in the other sources support for the assertion that Selene is "most often" accompanied by Phosphorus and Hesperus, is this what Bouillon says? Paul August ☎ 12:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul August, Unfortunately I don't have sources in English other than the British Museum one. You are right, that was poor phrasing on my part. What do you think of changing it to "often (or sometimes) interpreted as being..." --Brookford (talk) 12:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that kind of language would be good in the caption for the altar piece, but so far that is the only depiction (that I'm aware of) of Selene accompanied by figures interpreted as being Phosphorus and Hesperus. So unless we can find a source for this being a commonplace, I think we need to remove the mention of the pair in the sentence from the body of the article:

"Selene is commonly depicted with a crescent moon, often accompanied by stars (most often two: Phosphorus, the morning star, and Hesperus, the evening star)".

Note also that in that sentence "stars" means literal star figures, not human figures as personified stars, as in the altar piece. Paul August ☎ 13:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

above each of these human figures, you can see a star carved, indeed "literal star figures"--Bruxellensis (talk) 23:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul August, I have edited the page accordingly. I will try and find more sources to eventually put it back. --Brookford (talk) 13:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I look forward to more sources. Also do you have a copy of Bouillon, and can you tell me what he says? If he is just repeating that the two side figures in the altar piece are thought to be Phosphorus and Hesperus, I don't think we need him. The other three sources are plenty for that. Paul August ☎ 13:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I unfortunately do not. I copied the source from the Commons page for the image. --Brookford (talk) 13:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are not the Dioscuri, because the character on the left is awake and with open eyes, the character on the right sleeps and has his eyes closed, symbolizing the day and the night (morning star and night star). In addition, below the figure on the left is a torch with the flame at the top (day) and under the figure on the right is an overturned torch, the flame down (night). It is therefore unlikely that they are the Dioscuri, gods of the daytime sky.--Bruxellensis (talk) 23:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruxellensis and Brookford: I've copied this discussion to Talk:Selene, so that we (and others) can continue it there. Paul August ☎ 10:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Brookford

Thank you for creating Société des douze.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: thank you very much! --Brookford (talk) 21:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Brookford

Thank you for creating Genealogical and Heraldic Office of Belgium.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orts family moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Orts family, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Orts family

Hello, Brookford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Orts family".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Belgian families

Hello, Brookford. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Belgian families, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:United Business Institutes Brussels Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:United Business Institutes Brussels Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Third First Edit Day!

Hey, Brookford. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]