Welcome!

Hello, Burek021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

The article NMDC Protocol has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Syrthiss (talk) 13:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on my talk page. Syrthiss (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional links

Here are the additional links, that will back up claims stated in the section "Officials who support this theory" in the article Chemtrail conspiracy theory. If you read this, please move these to the Talk section of that article. On all pages, please just press "CTRL+F" (to open the Find dialog) and search for "Nikola Aleksic", to see for yourself that these links do confirm what is stated in that text, which was removed by some editors:

Ubica vreba sa neba (Večernje Novosti, 08.11.2012.) - novosti.rs is online portal of "Večernje Novosti", a daily newspaper founded back in 1953. in Belgrade, Serbia.

Skupština će raspravljati o trovanju iz vazduha (Press, 26.10.2012.) - pressonline.rs is online portal of "Press", a daily newspaper from Belgrade, Serbia.

Objašnjenje nedoumica oko hemijskih tragova na nebu - kemtrejlsa (Pravda, 08.10.2012.) - pravda.rs is online portal of "Pravda", a daily newspaper from Belgrade, Serbia. The 3rd section states (google translation): "More detailed information about the chemical traces in the sky can be obtained at the website of the Ecological Movement where he placed 15th with a scientific paper International Conference on Eco-environmental cities and suburbs under the title: Chemistry tracks as a global environmental threat.". Here, "Ecological Movement" (of Novi Sad) refers to Nikola Aleksic's "Ekoloski pokret Novog Sada" and his scientific paper named "Chemical trails as a global global environmental threat" (poorly translated with google as "Chemistry tracks as a global environmental threat").

Pokrenuta istraga zbog zaprašivanja hemijskim sredstvima iz aviona (Kurir, 02.02.2012.) - kurir-info.rs is online portal of "Kurir", a daily newspaper from Belgrade, Serbia.

NIKOLA ALEKSIĆ Srbija u kandžama "Monsanta" (Pečat, 28.01.2011.) - pecat.co.rs is online portal of "Naš pečat", a Belgrade founded publishing company (APR = Agencija za Privredne Registre = Agency for Business Registers = Company Register)

NAŠA TEMA: EKOLOŠKA KATASTROFA (02.09.1999.) - nin.co.rs is online portal of "NIN", a weekly news magazine from Belgrade, Serbia.

etc.

P.S. I could go on and on with links like these, to back up the claims in that section, but if your editors are acting in such a way that people can't post anything that is not in accordance to their beliefs, then I'm afraid people will just stop contributing to Wikipedia.

Officials who support the Chemtrails conspiracy theory

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Burek021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't used multiple accounts, so please unblock me so that I can defend my text, added to the article Chemtrail conspiracy theory. If you don't unblock me, please copy/paste all these references to the talk page, since I'm not able to do it. Btw it is ridiculous that you block people first and then start the talk about anything, effectively ignoring other opinions. That's anything but free speech.

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. There is no free speech on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:31, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Says the person who recently created Dummyusername1234 (talk · contribs). Also, if you continue to use open proxies for illegitimate purposes (such as trying to evade detection or sanctions) which is not allowed on any Wikimedia project, your account will be blocked indefinitely. Elockid ^(Talk) 14:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to answer to the talk page to add some more links to back up all the claims, since you banned me and other people too, who supported this thing. However, since I already see how things work here, don't worry, I won't be bothering any more with requests to lift off my block. I'll wait until it passes and I'll still prove my point.

Blatantly lying to us is not going to help you. It's quite obvious you were the person who was editing through those open proxies. Also note that continuing to edit war even while logged out will lead to escalating sanctions. Elockid ^(Talk) 18:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever... You are an "admin" and no matter what I say, I'll always be wrong, so I'll just ignore your comments until my block is lifted and will prove my text was credible, no matter what you say... ("These rules are no different than the rules of a computer system. Some of them can be bent. Others can be broken.)