Jump to content

User talk:Buskahegian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you! :D
Welcome to Wikipedia, Buskahegian! I am SarekOfVulcan and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 18:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bangor International Airport article

[edit]

Hi Buskahegian- Just an FYI regarding your first editof Feb 28 to the above article--I'm no authority here, but I think you'll find that the word 'international' in an airport's name means simply that it has capabilities for receiving international traffic, for example customs and immigration staff and/or facilities. Say hi to Maine for me. -Eric talk 19:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edit

[edit]

I like this extensive edit for the article History of Maine. Good work. GRBerry 03:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: February cookies

[edit]

Of course they're still good, they've been refrigerated since then. :-)

If we were in Florida, there'd be problems...--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 17:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you give details for the reference number 2 and 3 in this article. The reference only shows Ibid, it will be better to expand it to include author's name etc. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 01:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bangor, Maine article size

[edit]

Hello, I just noticed your comment at Talk:Bangor,_Maine#Article_size:_too_long and thought I'd reply. Let me know what you think. Best wishes, Baileypalblue (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Hi there,

I noticed you've added both Category:People from Maine and Category:People from Bangor, Maine to some articles. If the particular city has a category, in this case Bangor, only the city category should be used. I've been going through Category:People from Maine and trying to sort it as best I can.--TM 16:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Buskahegian Do you have any citation other than the camp's own website to justify reposting this encyclopedia information back. Please review Wikipedia:Notability before reposting this material.Dkriegls (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ku Klux Klan in Maine

[edit]

Thank you very much for starting Ku Klux Klan in Maine. I was thinking of starting the article myself, but I am sure that the one you started is much better. I have been saving this article as a source. Anyway, keep up the good work and let me know if there is anything I can help with.--TM 21:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words about the article. I've noticed and admired your own work as well. And thank you for the article you sent, which I'd not seen. I'll incorporate some of the points it makes - particularly about Jewish and NAACP attempts to create an anti-Klan united front - into the main article. I did the research partly as a tribute to my grandmother, who remembered being frightened by burning crosses set up on a hill overlooking her Catholic church. Buskahegian (talk) 03:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Erwin Kreuz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cute story, but typical case of one event. Does not meet WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 07:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erwin Kreuz for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erwin Kreuz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erwin Kreuz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crusio (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{unblock-auto}}. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edward Matthew Curran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Axis Sally
List of people from Bangor, Maine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Axis Sally

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Hampden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to New Ireland
Graham Building (Bangor, Maine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Union River
Morgan W. Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to APTI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Norman Cazden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bangor, Maine Notable people section.

[edit]

Hello Buskahegian, you recently undid my edit to Bangor, Maine. Your edit summary stated that the reason you did this was because the section was "removed without explanation". I find this disingenuous of you since I had an edit summary stating my explanation as moving per WP:USCITY guidelines. You can find the specific relevant consensus reached guidelines here: WP:USCITY#Notable people.

First, I moved the link to "see also", I didn't delete it. Second, consensus was reached that the section should be called "notable people". I am all for keeping the section instead of moving it to "see also", if that is your preference. However, I am going to change the name. I just wanted to open communication with you to be friendly and explain my edit in more detail :) Dkriegls (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dkiegls. I'm fine with calling the section "notable people". I undid the edit not because of the renaming, but the re-location. In the links you provided, I couldn't find any imperative for moving a "notable people" section out of the main body of an article, into "see also". Also, the guidelines use words like "may" or "can", which suggest flexibility. Thus my inquiry. But thanks for your explanation, and we seem to have reached consensus on both issues.Buskahegian (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, a long while back, I argued for keeping it in the body text, but lost. This discussion made me re-look and I was excited to see that consensus had shifted my way. So thanks :) Dkriegls (talk) 06:28, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people from Bangor, Maine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested at WikiProject Maine!

[edit]
Hello fellow WikiProject Maine members!
 
I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on!
  1. There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others.
    • Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia.
    • Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again.
    • Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices.
    • Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings.
  2. I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page!
  3. We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) at 17:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC). To remove yourself from this list, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/members, remove the WikiProject's userbox/category from your user page (rarely used for mass mailings), or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

[edit]
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

[edit]

Hi Buskahegian! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]