User talk:CTZMSC3/Archive/2

Archives

< 1 2 3 >

Could be

What kind of problems are you getting? (Oh, and with regard to reverting pagemove vandalism, I usually get better results from listing at WP:RM rather than doing it via the speedy tag) --Closedmouth 00:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yeah, that's a problem that I raised with Schutz. He said he fixed it, but apparently not. He hasn't been very active recently --Closedmouth 00:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Bitmap redirect

Hi,

You recently re-created the bitmap page and made it a redirect to bitmap image. Bitmap was recently speedily deleted so that the bitmap image article could be moved to this title. If anyone had edited the new redirect page after you'd recreated it, we'd have had to go through the whole process again. Please check to see if a page has recently been deleted before re-adding it. Thanks! Chris Cunningham 08:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey, thanks for this! J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 02:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Marking similar articles for deletion

That is not at all what I'm doing - I'm simply trying to make Wikipedia a fair place. Notice that I am not marking ALL social networking sites for deletion - only ones which have the same criteria as the article I wrote (not in the alexa top 100,000, not "verifiably significant"). Those were the reasons listed for deletion of the Yuniti article, and I'm simply trying to make the social networking list fair, if nothing else. - Marquinho 02:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Woophy

May I ask how come you reverted my mark for deletion on woophy? The article does not establish the site's significance, and it only has 1 reliable source (the wall street journal is a link to a PDF on the woophy site itself, which is neither verifiable nor reliable). -Marquinho 02:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Sexi

Again, another article I marked for deletion due to its lack of notability, not to mention lack of references and a rating of 260,000 on alexa. In addition, the article is written like an advertisement and completely biased. Am I missing something here? Were these not the reasons the Yuniti article was deleted? How are these any different? - Marquinho 02:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Bang, I am simply trying to understand the reasoning of the wikipedia editors. First I am told "your article was deleted because of A". I fix A, and then I'm told it's because of B (alexa ranking). I mark other articles, just like the yuniti article was marked, and I am now told that they don't qualify for it. I keep asking the wikipedia editors what it is that separates these articles from the yuniti article, and I get no response. I just asked you right now, and all I received was a "calm down" and a blanket "they don't fit the speedy deletion criteria". How, then, does the yuniti article fit it? All I'm asking is a list of differences that these articles and websites have which Yuniti does not. Thank you. -Marquinho 02:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

• The reasons for deletion were that the site does not rank above 100,000 on alexa, that it is written like spam, that the references were not valid enough, and that the article did not establish notability of the site. I thus went through the social networking list, and marked similar articles for deletion. I am simply trying to contribute to the social networking list (List_of_social_networking_websites) and make it as accurate as possible, and making sure that all sites listed there are on equal ground. -Marquinho 02:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • See here Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_13 for their reasons, which also apply to these other sites I marked for deletion. -Marquinho 02:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Fair enough, thanks so much. I'm also making an edit to do the woophy page, as I really don't believe that having an article on the site itself is a reliable source of information. Thanks again -Marquinho 04:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

wikilink in Fissile

Hi, just wondering why you removed the wikilink around fission-fusion-fission in Fissile? . Thanks, Edgriebel 20:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue

Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Easy db because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anthrax.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Anthrax.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Your Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		You found my secret page! Wikipedia:The MS-DOS game/logo Don't tell anyone where you found it. --Coastergeekperson04 05:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anthrax.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Anthrax.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MacosxlogoX1.png

Thanks for uploading Image:MacosxlogoX1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)