User talk:CallahanRobert

April 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Morning glory because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add personal opinions or analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cornelius Brothers & Sister Rose. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view and fails to keep the formal tone of the encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. NYBrook098 (talk) 06:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to add a brief page about a person of interest with like 4 articles online mentioning him.

It is hard to elaborate when opinion is outlawed. I can't add interesting stuff to his life until everyone that knew him is dead. So that leaves me with condensing about a page, to about a paragraph. If that's what is acceptable than so be it.

I love wikipedia. It will be alien's encyclopedia of choice a thousand years from now. Also, I don't really know what I am doing so I appreciate that there are people who take the time to squelch sub standard work.

The guy was in the shit, and photographed with Gen. Eisenhower, he should be mentioned. You're not a Nazi sympathizer are you? Where are you anyway? Woman's Basketball? In CT? Omg, you do have some free time, for sure.

I will re-read the editing instructions, play in the f-ing Sandbox if it will help. Then present a viable and as original as possible non-emotional, drab, mono-syllabic re-rendering of my unopinionated, and factual "description". ...Of the guy, and the photo.

People can hate me. I'm still happy.

Nobody hates you, but you cannot start with a brief synopsis that you copy and pasted from a copyrighted source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, we do not even permit it in early versions. --S Philbrick (Talk) 13:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wallace Strobel, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]