User talk:Candyapple690

Speedy deletion nomination of Farris Collins

Hello Candyapple690,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Farris Collins for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 10:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Candyapple690, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Candyapple690! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Candyapple690. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Candyapple690 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In 2018, I abused my Wikipedia account. Now wanting to return and positively contribute to Wikipedia, I am asking for this block to be removed given the time that has lapsed. I made an enormous mistake in abusing my edit privileges and can see the damage and harm I caused. Not only did it require other administrators to spend their time to correct, but could have led to misinformation being spread. I have learnt from my mistake and can confirm I will not do this again. I am sorry and hope to prove this by making amends - I have thought of positive edits including supporting pages requiring further development around chemistry and physics which I am studying in college. Thank you for your time and consideration. Candyapple690 (talk) 23:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I believe that you have matured in the last 4 years. You appear to understand what you did that led to us having to block your account. I appreciate that you didn't try to come back under a new account.

Welcome back. SQL ^{Query Me!} 01:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a checkuser block. I have investigated and determined it's Unlikely there's been recent block evasion, so the checkuser part of this block is lifted and any admin is free to review the block. --Yamla (talk) 10:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Yamla - I agree that it appears unlikely that there has been recent evasion.

Candyapple690, You appear to understand what went wrong, and genuinely want to contribute positively. I'm inclined to take you at your word, and unblock.

@Bbb23: I know this was a long time ago, but do you have any objections here? SQL ^{Query Me!} 00:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: Whatever you think best.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]