User talk:Carcharoth/Esperanza MfD review

Discussion

Note that some of these pages are related to either Membership or Governance, and are not covered by the Messedrocker Solution.--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?}Reviews? 22:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yah. But the historical record should still show that those pages once existed. That way people know that other stuff existed and was deleted. I won't quibble over those pages at the moment. Carcharoth 00:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If no one objects, I'm going to start classifying each page into their scope of the MfD decision in a new column. Was the page related to the Membership pages or Governance pages? Or not at all? This would be helpful when we determine what was supposed to be done to each page as dictated by the MfD. I'll get to work when I wake up in about 9 hours, since I don't have school tomorrow.--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?}Reviews? 05:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was the intention. I just hadn't go round to it yet. Please feel free to help out on the page. I'll set up a few subheading now, just to start things going. Carcharoth 05:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page keeps loading slowly every time I visit it. Would it be ok if I subpaged the sections?--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?}Reviews? 18:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just make sure you leave a link behind in the actual document saying where you moved stuff to. Thanks. Carcharoth 03:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, isn't this section redundant to the deletion table?--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?}Reviews? 03:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've restored it the way Mailer had it, I need that list to start working out how it all goes and in discussions with other admins, and I couldn't work out where Ed had moved it all. Steve block Talk 09:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]