User talk:CardsCrazy

Welcome!

Hello, CardsCrazy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — kashmiri ^TALK 08:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

In a recent edit to the page Sultan Bahu, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand or Ireland, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. — kashmiri ^TALK 08:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Shohei Ohtani. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Antonis Minou. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 12:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you fucking kidding me. What I put in was a link to show correct information. I don’t know what the hell you are talking about you idiot. So just shut the fuck up and let me do my own shit that can benefit the community you retard. CardsCrazy (talk) 22:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Macfarlane's Awards

So there are some page issues on this page but I can’t edit it to fix it. Like it’s obvious issues to. CardsCrazy (talk) 01:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bryce Harper, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:15, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Cool CardsCrazy (talk) 06:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Addison Russell. Philipnelson99 (talk) 06:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bitch

I added factual information u ghore CardsCrazy (talk) 06:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism, as you did at Ted Cruz. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 01:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism, as you did at Tom Brady. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 02:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aerius (band)

The article Aerius (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor and unreferenced band with no big sources that satisfy WP:N; fails WP:NBAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 14:47, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Addison Russell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Frood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Derek Jeter—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. – Frood (talk) 03:45, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at University of Northern Iowa. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:52, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]