User talk:Carroll F. Gray

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Carroll F. Gray, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Brave Dragon 21:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:Gustave Whitehead has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. intelati 01:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquette alert about Roger491127

Carroll, your name came up at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Roger491127. Feel free to participate in the conversation. Binksternet (talk) 06:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Color Question

No. Any custom signatures you see are just there for fun. Some users (myself included) have scripts installed to highlight user's names if they do have a particular status - for example, I see links to administrator's user pages highlighted in light blue, blocked user's names are crossed out, and indefinitely blocked users are crossed out in italics - but by default there's no distinction. Hope that helps! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whitehead sandbox

I would like to see how you would write the Gustave Whitehead article if you were the only editor. What if you copied and pasted the current article into some sandbox space and worked on it solo, perhaps at User:Carroll F. Gray/Whitehead or similar userspace? I would keep an eye on it and offer pointers. Eventually, when you felt that it was ready for show, you could seek consensus for replacing the current article with your version. Are you up for the challenge? Binksternet (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an example where I took a hotly debated aircraft article and made a sandbox version. You can see in the history that other editors took part in some of the editing—they showed up after they were told of the sandbox's existence, and they helped make it a better article. On that article's talk page (Talk:Coandă-1910, now in the archives), I offered a Request for Comment where I asked editors to decide whether the sandbox version should replace the mainspace version. The consensus was 'yes'. Binksternet (talk) 21:01, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I watched sandbox talk and want to add, that you can try categories and interwiki-links by adding a : [[:category...]] instead of [[category...]], you can see what will happen, but it's not active. Of course you have to remove the : when you copy from the sandbox to an article, smile. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:15, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gerda and Binksternet - I'll settle into this during the upcoming weekend and into next week and see what develops. Carroll F. Gray (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.95.122.230 (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Christopher Carter portrait.png

Thanks for uploading File:Christopher Carter portrait.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Hello Carroll F. Gray, I have marked the file File:Christopher Carter portrait.png as permissions received, no further action in this matter is needed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and happy editing. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 19:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Carter (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Carter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 19:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Carroll F. Gray, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 19:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Christopher Carter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christopher Carter, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Christopher Carter

Hello, Carroll F. Gray. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Christopher Carter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carroll F. Gray. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Christopher Carter

Hello, Carroll F. Gray. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Christopher Carter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Christopher Carter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christopher Carter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Carroll F. Gray. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]