User talk:Cazxiro
==Welcome== Hello Cazxiro and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've chosen to join us. This is a great project with lots of dedicated people, which might seem intimidating at times, but don't let anything discourage you. Be bold!, explore, and contribute. Try to be civil by following simple guidelines and signing your talk comments with ~~~~ but never forget that one of our central tenets is to ignore all rules.
If you want to learn more, Wikipedia:Tutorial is the place to go, but eventually the following links might also come in handy:
Help
FAQ
Glossary
Manual of Style
Float around until you find something that tickles your fancy. One easy way to do this is to hit the random page button in the navigation bar to the left. Additionally, the Community Portal offers a more structured way to become acquainted with the many great committees and groups that focus on specific tasks. My personal favorite stomping grounds are Wikipedia:Translation into English as well as the cleanup, welcoming, and counter-vandalism committees. Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has several other wiki projects that you might enjoy. If you have any more questions, always feel free to ask me anything on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Draeco 05:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Kylie Minogue X
[edit]Thank you so much for removing the fake tracklisting for X. I've been attempting to keep the false statements and utter rubbish off the page, but someone with an anonymous IP keeps re-adding false info which is why I had to get the page protected. After the protection is up in a few days, they'll probably try to re-add it so I'll try to keep a watch out for them. Thanks again! Pinkadelica (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
please see talk page at discography re Billbard refs for "Top of the World". thanks--Design (talk) 03:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hi there. Re "Top of the World" and "Right Now (NBA version)". I think we are disgreeing about the definition of "promotional" single. For example, as far as I can find out, "Sway" was released to media only as a physical "promo" CD single and a video, but neither were available for sale (though "Sway" became a bonus album track); the two previously mentioned songs were both released for sale via download to the public in US & Canada, when neither was available as part of a physical or download album. My understanding is that both Billboard & I regard "Sway" as a promo and the other too are not promo's, they are official single releases.--Design (talk) 10:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- The Dolls discography still conatins a number of errors. I will detial it on the talk page. regards.--Design (talk) 10:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Monrose singles
[edit]
Template:Monrose singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Doll Domination
[edit]Please accept this as constructive critism. Your edits to Doll Domination are WP:disruptive. The track-listing is listed according to whenever each version of the album came out. You cannot fail to accept that there was an internation deluxe version and a UK-only deluxe version. I listed each version in order of when they were released. There is a supporting reference so please do not delete. If you continue to delete this information you will be referred to administrators for disruptive editing which could result in a ban. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC))
- Albums should be listed chronologically. Each of the versions is listed according to when they were released. Each version be it a deluxe edition, collectors edition or doll domination 2.0/3.0 is listed using LEVEL 2 headings. this does not mean that the uk deluxe edition is part of the mini collection. If you look at the mini collection it has a CLEAR SMALL heading for its track-listing. this was the best way to accredit the information. if you look at the article's history it has had significant numbers of changes to try and find a layout/format that works because it is unconventional. Information belongs in chronology. For example if in the single's section i put "When i grow up" at the bottom of the section because it starts with the letter 'W' that does not make sense because it was the first single. I applied this logic when designing the format for the page. I called your edits disruptive (not alleged but described them as...) because you did not discuss them first on the discussion page and after i restored the track listing for the first you once again decided to delete it. This is an example of minor disruptive behaviour. These things should be discussed first espicially if deleting content. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC))
- This is not supposed to sound insulting but if you look at the top of Doll Domination there is something called a content box (its on the left, grey and full of blue links). Notice that some links are listed:
1
2 etc.
but then look under track-listing which is listed as 4 Track listing and you'll find that all editions of the album are indented and listed as 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 etc... this is the correct way that an article should look. all editions of the album are listed as sub-headings (level 3 headings) beneath the main heading (level 2 heading)"track listing". If it resolves the minor dispute we could change "track-listing" to "editions" or "versions" of the album? (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC))
Edit summaries
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit and is especially useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 03:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC))
February 2010
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Erin McCarley. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. XXX antiuser eh? 23:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Greatest Hits... So Far!!!, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Yves (talk) 02:46, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know if you checked the button by mistake, but an addition like this is certainly not minor. Please be more wary. Thanks. Yves (talk) 02:46, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Body Talk series
[edit]I see you've been editing the Body Talk article, and I'd like to bring something up with you. I don't know how long you've been on here, but that doesn't matter. Okay, so since Body Talk Pt. 3 will be released, I'm thinking either 1) Body Talk is just her 5th album, and the others are EPs, or 2) the 3 parts are studio albums, and Body Talk is a compilation album. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 05:00, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think there should be a separate page for the third one. It does have a different cover, name and such. And I agree, studio albums make sense and Body Talk just being a compilation of them all. I'm going to start making a page for it on my sandbox and try some things out. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 23:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- I was working on doing it, but I've decided it might be a good idea to just keep it in the Body Talk page. But have a bit more info for it, such as the cover etc. I'm currently trying something out like N.B. (album) ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 00:06, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm having troubles getting the two Germany dates to show up. Do you think you could help me with it? Haha, yeah, I think it's gonna work. :) ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 00:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- I was working on doing it, but I've decided it might be a good idea to just keep it in the Body Talk page. But have a bit more info for it, such as the cover etc. I'm currently trying something out like N.B. (album) ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 00:06, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think there should be a separate page for the third one. It does have a different cover, name and such. And I agree, studio albums make sense and Body Talk just being a compilation of them all. I'm going to start making a page for it on my sandbox and try some things out. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (Talk) 23:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Cazxiro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cazxiro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)