User talk:Cbrody

Image tagging for File:TP Brody with early AM-LCD screen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TP Brody with early AM-LCD screen.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK to delete this image. I was under the impression it was copyright free but it isn't. -- cbrody

T Peter Brody

T Peter Brody, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! I have communicated to you outside Wikipedia though I suppose I should officially document the same here.

There is a potential conflict of interest (WP:COI) here so please be careful of your sources. In particular, as I have said elsewhere, reference both the Early Life and career and Awards and Honours sections with reliable source (WP:RS) references. If in doubt, consult me on my talk page and I will help as necessary
Be aware of potentially unsubstantiated yet controversial statements such as "... and the inventor of ...". If Brody was indeed the sole inventor then fine but if he was part of a team then you need to say that. In either case, ensure you have a reliable source that backs this up
The images are not properly licensed. Check WP:IUP
Consider putting a Template:American English template on the article talk page to discourage people like me changing some of the spelling (e.g. program)
Also consider adding other relevant banners on the talk page such as for his country of birth or his discipline (if such banners exist). Consult other similar articles to see what banners they use on the their talk pages
I have added the article to categories (see bottom of article) though you may feel that the article is relevant to other categories too

consider editing Brody (name) and Active-matrix liquid crystal display to reflect the new article you created

--Senra (Talk) 10:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Active Matrix

Factoid: The OED credits the noun active matrix to 1975 T P Brody et al as the inventors of the term. You can use this in your article with the expression:

<ref name=OEDActiveMatrix>{{cite web|title=Active Matrix|http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/1953?redirectedFrom=active%20matrix#eid19485881|year=2011|work=[[OED]]|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|accessdate=12 October 2011}}{{subscription required}}</ref>

which results in

"Active Matrix". OED. Oxford University Press. 2011. Retrieved 12 October 2011.(subscription required)

or alternatively and more explicitly

<ref>[[OED]] (2011) active matrix " T. P. Brody et al. in IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 22 740/1 The difficulties and limitations of passive matrix-addressed displays‥have led us to explore ‘active’ matrixes, i.e., matrixes which contain gain-producing and switching elements at their points of intersection"</ref>

resulting in

OED (2011) active matrix " T. P. Brody et al. in IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 22 740/1 The difficulties and limitations of passive matrix-addressed displays‥have led us to explore ‘active’ matrixes, i.e., matrixes which contain gain-producing and switching elements at their points of intersection"

--Senra (Talk) 16:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TP Brody with early AM-LCD screen.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:TP Brody with early AM-LCD screen.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Senra (Talk) 21:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Just to show my appreciation for your recent efforts on Wikipedia.

Senra (Talk) 21:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and career section

Cbrody, I have discovered that the first section of your article on T Peter Brody is a mixture of direct quotes from the Information Display memoriam and close paraphrasing of the text, without an inline citation for attribution. You need to read the Wikipedia plagiarism policy.

I can see that it will be hard to substantially reword this material if it's your only citable source for his early life and career, but you need to find a way. And time is running out for the DYK nomination - Oct 12 is now second from the top of the active list. RockMagnetist (talk) 04:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a citation from the Pittsburgh obituary. I think this obituary would help you to reword the section. RockMagnetist (talk) 04:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. A difficult one as the original (from which SID and others largely copied) was written by a combination of my father (as per his CV), his colleagues, myself and my sisters. The original document is here: [T P Brody]. This doc of course doesn't fulfil the WP:RS qualifications. --Cbrody (talk) 14:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This situation is certainly full of ironies! RockMagnetist (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps, I keep plodding through this. For example, I wrote to the University of London yesterday (and received an automated reply saying student records would charge me £15 to confirm the degree, PhD and lecturing so that was a no no for me) and I also wrote to the Guildhall School of Music & Drama in London asking for confirmed information. I had thought of writing to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office formerly the FO re his SOE work but decided not to (Official Secrets Act). I will continue to plug away. However, if you want my opinion, I would bin whatever is in the early life section at the moment and put cited prose back later :) --Senra (Talk) 16:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that is necessary. Straight news articles (not opinion pieces) satisfy the reliable source policy. I don't know whether the Information Display qualifies; but one source will do for now. But the rewrite is essential. RockMagnetist (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On a separate note - how about the phrase "... one of the early pioneers ..."? --Senra (Talk) 16:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is a new subject, I have removed your indentations. Where do you want to use this phrase?RockMagnetist (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to think outside the box here. Cbrody (naturally) wishes to say that Brody developed the technology yet the references do not support this so I was thinking, perhaps in the article and the DYK hook to use that phrase --Senra (Talk) 16:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just tried a google scholar search using the search term "Brody T P". I am not very familiar with how to use google scholar so I leave others to interpret these results. 28,000 results seems to me, a layman in this context, too many - though I did notice some false positives, such as the JA Brody on the third page --Senra (Talk) 18:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I then restricted another google scholar search to 1945+ and the three topics "Physics, Astronomy, and Planetary Science", "Chemistry and Materials Science" and "Engineering, Computer Science, and Mathematics" resulting in 131 hits including ...

This paper, A light interrupter of continuously variable on-off ratio may be the earliest paper by T Peter Brody that is indexed online. I notice that the paper includes his post noms. I am not sure but you may be able to use the paper as a source for “Brody received his Ph.D. in theoretical physics in 1953 from the University of London. From 1953 to 1959, he worked as Senior Lecturer in Physics at the University”

I count seven papers by Brody tagged Westinghouse between 1962 (Nature of the Valley Current in Tunnel Diodes) and 1975 (Thin film transistor-addressed display device). Again, I am not sure but these may be enough to confirm his tenure at Westinghouse

--Senra (Talk) 19:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is really close now. There are just those two remaining paragraphs in Early Life and Career, and then I'll happily clear it for DYK. RockMagnetist (talk) 19:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Next steps for the T P Brody article

You may be happy with the progress that the article T Peter Brody has made since its first creation on 6 October 2011 using the Wikipedia article creation process. On the other hand, you may wish to take the article further. For example, you could consider submitting the article to the peer review process which would be followed by a Good Article nomination then a Featured Article nomination. There is no guarantee that an article will succeed at any one stage and each stage is progressively harder than next. In my opinion the article in its current state would sail through a peer review. The peer review process would be simpler for you if, once you have submitted the article, you recruit a volunteer as recommended on the Wikipedia:Peer review page. Good luck --Senra (Talk) 11:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page archival

You may wish to consider archiving aged discussions on your talk page using one of the methods suggested at Archiving a talk page. There are automated methods that are suitable for users with busy talk pages. I use a manual method as described at the top right of my own talk page --Senra (Talk) 11:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, since I posted above, I have changed my archive method to automatic. I now use a variation of Chzz (talk · contribs)'s method as described here. To see my code, feel free to edit my talk page then view the archive code at the top of the page --Senra (Talk) 21:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for T Peter Brody

On 26 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article T Peter Brody, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that T Peter Brody invented the thin-film transistor active matrix display, the predominant flat panel display technology in use today? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/T Peter Brody.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done, thanks from the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Independent research forum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Independent research forum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.irforum.org/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. for (;;) (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progressive Alliance (UK) (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero independent references that discuss the Alliance, and ELINKs all over the place. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Progressive Alliance (UK) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progressive Alliance (UK) has been accepted

Progressive Alliance (UK), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anna Tam

Hello, Cbrody. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anna Tam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]