User talk:Cdiasoh

Hello Cdiasoh, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Blooded Edge ^Sign/_Talk 19:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Helpme

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

I need help with the Cinco de Mayo page. It is written w/ a very slanted tone and IMO violates the WP:NOTESSAY rules. There are more details in on the Cinco de Mayo page about the Battle of Puebla than on the actual Battle of Puebla wiki page. Can I get help in neutralizing this article. Cdiasoh (talk) 16:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with the way the article is written, please use its talk page (i.e. Talk:Cinco de Mayo) to discuss your concerns with the other editors of this article. If discussion is impossible, there are multiple tools for dispute resolution available. If there are insufficient editors on that talk page to discuss the issues you perceive, you can use Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Regards So Why 17:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I briefly looked at the page; it doesn't look terribly slanted to me, although perhaps what I've learned about Cinco de Mayo has that same slant. You are welcome to add other information to show a counterbalancing point of view, but make sure that it is well-cited. As for NOTESSAY, the page is pretty well-cited. Are there any particular bits that appear to be original research? If so, you can be bold and cite it yourself, or remove it. Be sure that, if you do remove it, you include an edit summary explaining that the parts you are removing are original research. Otherwise, that can be easily mistaken as vandalism. Regarding the Battle of Puebla, if you feel that some of the information in the Cinco de Mayo article can be used to expand the Battle of Puebla article, please do add it. However, do not remove information from the Cinco de Mayo article simply because it does not exist in the Battle of Puebla article. You should also bring up your concerns on Talk:Cinco de Mayo. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 17:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks GW. I put my concerns in the discussion and rewrote the summary to paraphrase a quote in the summary. I wrote it down in the discussion. It was my contention that although well cited the references contained too many articles of opinion rather than references of fact. e.g. http://egpnews.com/?p=9337 http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/04/30/cinco_to_drinko_not_for_me_amigo/ Cdiasoh (talk) 18:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can only see the opening paragraph of that article, so I don't really know how good it is. However, the article is from a reliable source, and is being used to cite a sentence saying that Cinco de Mayo is not a federal holiday. It doesn't appear to be inserting any of the opinion of that article into the Wikipedia article... – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 18:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cdiasoh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cdiasoh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cdiasoh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]