User talk:Cgx8253

Do you have a reference for this?

Hi there Cgx, do you have a reference for this change that you made to Cubans?

I have noticed that your M.O. is to blank talk page messages instead of replying to them. Please don't do that here. Many of your edits are unsourced, and when you do cite a source, you don't link to it, you just state what your source is in your edit summary (for example this edit). That's actually making life tougher for other users, because it's difficult to track down exactly what your source says.

Would you mind telling me your source for the change to Cubans? Thanks kindly, A Train^talk 09:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wawa (company), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 05:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of retailers' cooperatives. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of retailers' cooperatives.. Since you had some involvement with the List of retailers' cooperatives. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content

You have continued removing sourced content and replacing it with unsourced content, despite numerous warnings and despite a prior block. As you obviously have no intention of changing, I have now blocked you indefinitely. Any admin is free to unblock you if you commit to citing all future contributions with reliable sources and if you demonstrate a clear understanding of this, such as by providing a sample, non-trivial edit which includes the proper citations. --Yamla (talk) 12:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

Stop posting unblock requests and then removing them a few minutes later. That's just wasting people's time. You are welcome to make an unblock request but you aren't welcome to keep on abusing your talk page access by posting them and then removing them a few minutes later. --Yamla (talk) 15:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cgx8253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla discriminates against me.

Decline reason:

Indeed; Wikipedia discriminates against people who persistently add unsourced content. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are also not permitted to remove unblock declines for active blocks. --Yamla (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned once. Next time you remove a declined unblock request for a currently-active block, you lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion as 185.152.67.28 in January, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User has engaged in block evasion to continue adding unsourced content, all the way through October, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]