Jump to content

User talk:Chebyshev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reincarnation

[edit]

thankyou Chebyshev! I will be more careful how i express numbers in future. i see that The cycle of death and rebirth goes on, even here on wikipedia. do try to keep the profanity in check though.Benny the wayfarer (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Benny, the 'guide to formatting numbers' isn't the most exciting reading, but it's nice to have everything look consistent. Sorry if i was sarcastic about it Chebyshev (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2C-B and "paradoxical" reactions

[edit]

Thanks for your edit on 2C-B. For the record, though, in pharmacology a paradoxical reaction is simply a reaction opposite to the drug's expected effect. Whoever wrote the sentence wasn't quite using the term properly, but I believe that was the intended definition - not the implication of a logical "paradox." Cheers! St3vo (talk) 23:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your help, and for taking the time to inform me. Chebyshev (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

[edit]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Your Edit Summaries, in particular, should demonstrate more Wikipedia:Civility. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

[edit]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

161.225.129.111 (talk) 19:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of France

[edit]

Hi

I have reverted your edits on this article. Air superiority and Air Supremacy are not the same thing, and air superiority is not defined in the air Supremacy page or vice-versa (there are two seperate articles). This was what was being pointed out in the article. Dapi89 (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. If you believe that you are the fool. You are a venomous cretin aren't you? If I were you I would address your attitude toward people that give you the courtesy of a response. You will find it is not welcome on wikipedia. Dapi89 (talk) 22:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, nasty uneducated lying fools don't stay calm in the face of abuse and only a uneducated lying fool would throw insults at another editor. I'm reporting you. Dapi89 (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know what is psychologically wrong with you. It seems that there must be a medical condition that compels you to behave in this way. I suggest you invest in a shrink. Looking at your history, you have done this to other editors so you are prolific. Your language reads like a child not mine. Your incapable of being civil and using any other language, other than profantiy, as a means of expression. Who is the uneducated twelve year old child now? Dapi89 (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Your edit summaries are incredibly uncivil and it seems you have been given warnings regarding uncivil editing before. If you post another edit summary similar to this, this, or this, I will block your account indefinitely.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

      • Close to 100 constructive edits, and no disruptive or unhelpful edits to the Wikipedia namespace, yet again I am chased away for my insufficiently subservient attitude on talk pages and the like. Chebyshev (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]