User talk:CherieSalmon

Deleted content not lost

In any article, View history, then clicking on prev will show what has been deleted or added by that edit. I recommend not trying to restore the magazine articles. Wikipedia articles are about people, but are not intended to be places for listing all of their publications. David notMD (talk) 11:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The COI

I activated to COI template on your User page, and set it to link to the draft. I also removed the nowiki from your intent to submit the article, so it now has the submit banner at the top. Review may take up to two months, but can be much shorter, as reviewers pick what they want to review rather than in order submitted. If declined, the reviewer will provide rationale for that decision. David notMD (talk) 15:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi CherieSalmon! You created a thread called Draft: Maynard Hubbard Salmon II at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CherieSalmon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft rejected

The draft was declined at AfC. The editor erred in posting the notice on my talk, but should be adding it here, soon. Reason given: "This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject." This is one of the standard-worded replies (and one that is not uncommon when the person who created the article has/had a personal relationship with the subject). Take it as guidance to revising the draft, especially the Coursing section. I revised some of the book section - references not needed, just publisher and ISBN. Good luck. David notMD (talk) 09:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend removing the listing of the three fiction books. His fiction writing, while about land use and abuse in the southwest, does not rightly fit with the rest of his information on outdoors preservation. And as books were self-published, only a weak addition to notability in general. David notMD (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think I should remove the Coursing section too? I didn't know him till well after that period of his life and I had an old friend of his write that portion...I can see now that she was way too 'peacocky'... CherieSalmon (talk) 14:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know the draft is less than half the length of what you had started with, but all of my edits have been with intention of improving odds of draft being accepted. In current state, the Coursing section is the weakest part, and could result in another decline. A bit more shortening by you could help. My suggest is submit with, and if the next reviewer declines, see that person's reasons. David notMD (talk) 18:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That makes great sense! And THANK YOU very much for all of your help! CherieSalmon (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.grantcountybeat.com/news/obituaries/49910-salmon-m-h-dutch-salmon-73-silver-city-nm. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II has been accepted

Maynard Hubbard Salmon, II, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]