User talk:Chnitke

Speedy deletion nomination of International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola

Hello Chnitke,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola

Hello Chnitke,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola

Hello Chnitke,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola

Hello, Chnitke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola - IGT Bitola—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola - IGT Bitola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola - IGT Bitola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola - IGT Bitola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola

Hello, Chnitke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

International Triennial Of Graphic Art - IGT Bitola moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, International Triennial Of Graphic Art - IGT Bitola, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article El Calabozo cove. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing here, here, and here. I realize you're in some kind of contest, but please slow down and carefully evaluate your sources. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, immediately after being warned, you added sources to two more very clearly identified mirrors. The alchetron reference you added here very cleary notes: "References Chitō Station Wikipedia (Text) CC BY-SA". The Dbpedia link you added here notes "This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License". Many links you are adding are also broken, and you're not verifying the content or the quality of the sources. Most of the rest of your sources look like junk travel scrapers that may or may not be reliable. Please stop, slow down and be careful. If you continue to add false sources like this in this contest without acknowledging this warning, this account may be disabled until you reply. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I really don't understand, where did I go wrong, can you help me, thank you very much Chnitke (talk) 13:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left you a very detailed explanation of the problem above. Here's a simple version: other web sites copy material from Wikipedia; we cannot use that copied material to source the same, original material here. Does that makes sense? Sam Kuru (talk) 01:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing with poor sourcing

As discussed above, you have added poor and unreliable sources to dozens of articles. I am in the process of removing many of them. These sources are not independent or reliable and are often just mirror sites (sites that repost Wikipedia's content whole-cloth) and are therefore useless as sources. Please stop this - your contest is not worth the cost of other editors needing to mop up these poor edits. Kazamzam (talk) 23:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and I apologize for the inconvenience Chnitke (talk) 09:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I stop the activities regarding the allegations Chnitke (talk) 09:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ivo Mršnik

Hello, Chnitke,

Thank you for creating Ivo Mršnik.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add more sources to unsourced statements for verification

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Reading Beans}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Reading Beans (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Reading Beans

Thank you for pointing out the errors and the exceptionally fast and professional response.

That means a lot to me.

I followed your instructions and now I think we have an improved situation with many more sources.

For me, it will be very encouraging and motivating if you have time to look at the page with the changes made and if you find that there is an improvement.

Thank you very much for your engagement.

Chhnitke Chnitke (talk) 19:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:International Triennial Of Graphic Art - IGT Bitola

Hello, Chnitke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Triennial Of Graphic Art - IGT Bitola, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola

Hello, Chnitke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "International Triennial Of Graphic Art Bitola".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article written in language other than English

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Međunarodno bijenale minijaturne granite i crteža bitola ibm bitola to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. ForsythiaJo (talk) 21:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International biennale of miniature graphics and drawings Bitola

The article International biennale of miniature graphics and drawings Bitola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, as it is unsourced. I couldn't find any reliable sources for the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International biennale of miniature graphics and drawings Bitola

The article International biennale of miniature graphics and drawings Bitola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT. During a WP:BEFORE I found absolutely no sources. The article was previously the subject of a malformed PROD, but as it was not contested I am being bold and properly nominating this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International biennale of miniature graphics and drawings Bitola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International biennale of miniature graphics and drawings Bitola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International biennale of miniature graphics and drawings Bitola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 07:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please clean up articles before publishing them

Hello. An article you started, Anamarija Stibilj Šajn, had broken links when you stopped editing it. In this version (the article as it was when you left it), if you click the link for Azad Karim (reference number 7), it will appear to be a dead link because there's an extra / at the end. Or look at reference number 4: it's broken and won't lead anywhere because there's a missing full stop in the middle. Aside from the broken links, an artist's name was written as 'Sonja Tavčar Skaber', when it should be 'Sonja Tavčar Skaberne'.

These are simple things to fix, and they should have been fixed before the article was published. Although the typo in the artist's name and the link for Azad Karim may not be immediately noticeable, the fact that there's a problem with ref number 4 is quite obvious, even if one is not sure exactly what's wrong before examining it.

To avoid this, please compose and edit articles in your sandbox. Review them and fix any problems. Then after they are cleaned up, move them to 'mainspace'. Please don't write things directly in mainspace until you have more experience editing. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Chnitke. Thank you for your work on Jasmina Atanasova. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work. To meet the wp:notability requirement for existence as a separate article requires that there be multiple independent sources which cover the topic of the article (HER) in depth. The sources cover the book "When the Dust Settles" not her. And so the content covers the book "When the Dust Settles" not her. Could not find any real sources (much less GNG sources) which cover here. Suggest merging this article into the book article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind advice.

I will try to set up links right away.

Keep up the productive and creative work Chnitke (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your additions on the basis of MOS:OVERLINK; adding 8 sources to verify one claim is far too many, and draws questions of why are so many sources needed to support one claim. "Are they weak sources?" "Do they barely mention the claim?" "Why so many?"... questions like these. As a rule of thumb, adding more than 3 sources per claim is generally not recommended in most cases (unless something is very controversial, or the claim is complex). If any of the sources you added help support other claims or parts of the article, move them to where they are most effective, but if you really need 8 sources to support a claim on a noncontroversial topic, maybe you need to reconsider what is being claimed. Zinnober9 (talk) 12:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right.

Thank you for the professional guidelines.

I hope I didn't burden you too much.

I will post only a few confirmations about the novel. Chnitke (talk) 16:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy if, with these corrections, I came closer to your well-meaning teachings.

And that I am close to your most professional pointers.

Thank you very much.

I would like to bookmark this page, because the novel was declared the novel of the year by the "Takec" foundation in North Macedonia and is quite popular and in demand.https://umno.mk/promovirano-srpskoto-izdanie-na/ Chnitke (talk) 16:57, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]