Jump to content

User talk:Christian75/Archive 2014

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 2010Archive 2012Archive 2013Archive 2014

08:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

how did i create an attack page

i do not like u insulting me by implying i am attacking and being a bigot u r wrong and i will not tolerate your baseless accusations — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberalufp (talkcontribs) 12:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

@User:Liberalufp: The page you created said "xyz is a idiot" (xyz was a name), the closing admin deleted the page, look at User:Liberalufp/dayla. Christian75 (talk) 12:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

08:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

09:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Regarding your assessments

Hi Christian75,

I find your article assessments bewildering and quite frankly damaging to Wikipedia. You seem to look at quantity only. Your start class assessments are an invitation to wholesale article replacement by new editors and your importance assessments are invitations to mergers. In order to genuinely be able to judge the quality of an article you would have to be able to compare the total scope of a topic with the ground already covered in this article. No chemist alive today is able to do that for every chemistry page within Wikipedia. Please rethink your work method. V8rik (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

@V8rik: Do you have any examples? I think I my answer would be better if I could could explain why I gave the article what I gave it. Christian75 (talk) 18:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

10:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

09:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

08:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

09:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

08:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality scale

Hi, I recently created a biographical article on Peter Edward Trench which I noticed you recently rated as Start-Class on the WikiProject Biography quality scale. I note that this means "An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources." and that "Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation." I am keen to improve this article and would welcome some indication from you as to how I address "lacks adequate reliable sources" and "needs substantial improvement in content and organisation." I know little about rating articles but would have thought that the article currently meets all the criteria mentioned in 'B' on the quality scale. Graemp (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

"hydrochloric acid is not a salt"

Looking forward to learning why it is not a salt. I could be wrong, but am curious about why not. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Smokefoot – Sorry, my mistake, its not a molecule etiher (I confused it with hydrogen chloride, which btw have a picture of H-Cl). Its a solution consisting of ions. A salt (IUPAC, Gold book), is "A chemical compound consisting of an assembly of cations and anions"[126]. I do not think people would say that a solution is a salt, but? Christian75 (talk) 12:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
I agree with your view. Just wondering. Thanks. --Smokefoot (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Wgolf. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Bibart razvan, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

I nominated the article for speedy deletion. Maybe the software review the page at the same time... Christian75 (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Christian, I do not agree with the rating of this article and would like to know if this is your own classification. We need a discussion and further hints and detailed critic on the article. Regards--Oursana (talk) 12:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Oursana, its my own classification, and i am no authroity :-). I assume that you think it should be a B? I think its at least a C, and normally I do not grade it higher than C unless I am pretty sure that it covers the whole topic. So feel free to grade it B. If you want it GA (good article), you shuld read here Wikipedia:Good articles. Keep on the nice work Christian75 (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I made it a B and will slowly continue. --Oursana (talk) 02:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

10:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Would you care to explain why you removed the PROD tag? Given the fact that the tag included a fully explained rationale, one should expect that somebody who removes the tag would say something about it. Kraxler (talk) 02:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Please forget my previous question. I just saw that after you removed the tag, you redirected the page. Well, that was certainly WP:BOLD, but another user has reverted you, and has added a few things I've never seen on dab pages before (like "a character played by") to justify the reversal. Cheers. Kraxler (talk) 03:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

Two rollbacks - confused

Christian75, first let me say: Thanks for editing wikipedia. It's always nice to see someone who cares about the details. This isn't a complaint at all, so please don't take it that way.

  • On [your rollback of the change] in Seratonin syndrome, the image is of a molecule, which isn't the disease, and the label is of a disease, which isn't the molecule. They are related, but confusingly paired. I recognize that I was wrong to edit the label. It was, clearly, (embarrassingly) a disease box that I mistook for a chembox. Perhaps, though, you might consider deleting the image or changing it, rather than simply rolling back the change to the (prior and current) slightly confusing state? Just a thought.
  • On [your rollback of the change] in Bechamp reaction, you said that "anilines" is more specific than "amines". That is true, sort of. Aniline is a specific compound, not a class of compounds, as the page implies by using the plural. According to Wikipedia's entries, aniline is an element within the set of amines. I think if it is to remain plural, it should be changed (back) to amines, or the entry for aniline should be updated to reflect your understanding that anilines are a class of compounds. I'll leave you with the choice, rather than rolling back your rollback.
What do you think? Riventree (talk) 20:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Riventree - Aniline is a specific compound, anilines is a group of compounds based on aniline (try search for anilines at google). Btw, we do have a category:anilines. Its a problem for chemical classes that they are singular at wikipedia. A lot of compounds are named as the parent compund, like cyclopropane and cyclopropanes Christian75 (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
About Serotonin syndrome - I just saw it (by accident), and I have not really any opinion about the infobox.
Cheers! Riventree (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Paco de Lucía

Paco and Pepe de Lucía's mother, Lucia Gomes, was Portuguese and her surname was Gomes, not Gómez. Evidently I missed something when I was corrected the surname. Thanks. Yours, Quis separabit? 05:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

09:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

09:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Ǿ

Hello, I see that you are Danish and that you edited the Ø article. Is it possible to write Ǿ on a Danish keyboard? Can you try it? I have tried installing a Danish keyboard layout on my Windows-computer, and it is possible for me to write Ó and Ø but not Ǿ on it.--BIL (talk) 22:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

BIL: hmm. No I cant write it. Like you, I can write ó (for all vowels, but æøå/ÆØÅ). In matter of fact I have never seen Ǿ used. The Retskrivningsordbog (Danish orthographic dictionary) says[178] accent aigu may be used for any letters but å. Christian75 (talk) 22:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

07:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

18:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

09:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Grue and bleen

I'm afraid I don't understand this edit, can you spare me a clue? Paradoctor (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Paradoctor – I removed #Redirct from at talk page which isnt a redirect because it has a wikiproject template. It is possible, but normal, to make a centralized talk page, see WP:TALKCENT. Christian75 (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi

I think you should check what type of ip address you're posting to before leaving vandalism notices on an anonymous user talk page. This is a generic ip for H3G cell phone users and your message was probably spammed to hundreds of people uninvolved in the vandalism.

Thanks 188.29.165.107 (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

I have added {{shared IP}} on the talk page. Christian75 (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

08:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

We need your help testing latest huggle

Hello,

I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on meta:Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions!

Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

Grabriela Isler

Not that I care that much, but I find it strange that, that IP moved Gabrielas article without any discussion or consensus. That is against Wikipedias policy. I also find it strange that instead of reverting the article back to its original name you just let it be. Just saying. --BabbaQ (talk) 14:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

BabbaQ – I have no opinion about her name. In matter of fact I dont know her. I saw the article was moved, I checked the history of the new article and compared it with the old article and saw that a merge of the history was possible without much trouble. The new article was edited after the move so I decided not to request it deleted and afterwards redirect it back to the original name. But feel free to redirect it back (at least I will not revert you :-). Christian75 (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

07:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

08:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

07:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

07:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

06:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

07:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Cadmium(I) hydride listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cadmium(I) hydride. Since you had some involvement with the Cadmium(I) hydride redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 15:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

08:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

08:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

The article Members of the European Parliament 2014–19 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is redundant to the article List of members of the European Parliament, 2014–19. Both pages provide breakdowns, only the other one is more thorough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Kndimov (talk) 22:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

07:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

07:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

07:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Process question on PROD

Hi Christian75,

I saw that you declined my prod on LNX Code 8. I'm happy with the article turning into a redirect, but based on your edit summary I'm pretty sure I've misunderstood something. What little information is in the "code 8" article has been added to the Elonex One article. I used the word "merge" there, which might not have been appropriate. What am I missing here? Thanks, Lesser Cartographies (talk) 14:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lesser Cartographies - If you compare the current version of LNX Code 8 with this edit Elonex ONE it looks like it has been copy/pasted (merged). I think a redirect would be a good solution because LNX Code 8 is mentioned at Elonex ONE. It sounds like you know that the content of Wikipedia is copyrighted. (otherwise look at Wikipedia:Merge and delete) Christian75 (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the pointer—I can see the confusion I caused now. I'll go ahead and make the page a redirect. Thanks for the help! Lesser Cartographies (talk) 03:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

06:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

07:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

07:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

07:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

re Infobox element: what are yo trying to say?

re {{Infobox element/sandbox}}: what are yo trying to say? And why this way?-DePiep (talk) 22:33, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

I am trying not to force the size of the image to be 250px. It should be set by user preferences, which could be from 120 to 300px. I know it isnt finished, it has to check if the image is defined, but the size is working. Christian75 (talk) 22:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
DePiep, btw. I have tested it. If I change thumbnail size (in Special:Preferences) the size of the image change too. Christian75 (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
As far as I can follow. 1. Again, why this way? (editing a running porocess?), and 2. "should be set by user preferences" -- user (editor) pref is an exception, to be motivated (i.e., when user/editor edits the page's infobox input). It primarily should be set by the meta {infobox element}, defaults & prefereneces. -DePiep (talk) 22:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Isnt that the way to do it - its a sandbox? Why do you want to force the size of the image? On my screen you make the image smaller. Wikipedia:Thumb#Thumbnail_sizes says thumb should be used, and we shouldnt force any size of images. And MOS:INFOBOX contains nothing about size of images. Where do you get from that it should be size of image should be set by the infobox? Christian75 (talk) 22:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
To continue at WT:ELEM. -DePiep (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Listen. As we speak (actually, as I speak), I am editing & working myself with that sandbox and its effects. Intensively, with dozens of pages to follow. If you cannot communicate about what you do, I'll revert yours everything. What I don't understand, will go. -DePiep (talk) 23:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

DePiep, I am using module:infoboxImage which is normal to use in infoboxes to display images. The size worked after I removed _ from - I think its a bug! Btw. its the same parameter I proposed to do with {{chembox}} Christian75 (talk) 23:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
As I said: listen (i.e., read my concerns). You are editing the same set of pages I am working with. You just don't do that without communication. OK? -DePiep (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
From documentation, "Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (edit | diff) and testcases (edit) pages.", otherwise move it to your user space.

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

08:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

New huggle 3.1 is going to be released soon

Hi Christian75, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle connect!

Major changes:

  • Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
  • Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
  • Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far

In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

07:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

07:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

VM is free software?

Would you pleas explain this edit? The VM I used from around 1985 to 2001 was not free software, it was licensed by IBM for large fees. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jc3s5h:: The infobox says it was PD from 1972-1986, but proprietary from 1986-present. The versions from before 1986 is still PD. I think it should be in wikiproject software too. I have no experience with the software. Christian75 (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
There was a period when it was free, but the hardware that could run it was very expensive. Now those old versions can be run on the Hercules emulator (although I've never used that emulator). But due to the Year 2000 problem I don't know if the old versions of VM could be used to do anything useful today. So I don't know if that falls under what the free software project wants to cover. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
@Jc3s5h:: Feel free to remove the wikiproject :-) I will not revert Christian75 (talk) 14:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm not familiar with the goals of the WikiProject, so I'll leave it to you to decide. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

09:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

Chromium chromate

Hi I reverted the redirect on chromium chromate. When I checked into this topic a few months ago, I could find, I recall, no evidence for the independent existence of a chromium chromate, the literature trail is rather thin. The chemical literature is filled with all sorts of weird names concocted by early investigators before it was appreciated how rapid electron- and atom-transfer works. One could imagine all sorts of things but for the most part such mixed valence species (where the valences differ by >2 units) are pretty rare in the absence of a special ligands, in which case they are no longer binary phases. But if you have any insights into this niche let me know. The topic is near my area of specialization so I could be helpful in locating sources. Cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 13:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Also I dont know: what does "R without mention" mean?--Smokefoot (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
@Smokefoot: - {{R without mention}} is " a redirect to an article without any mention of the redirected word or phrase."[567], and "Articles should mention any person, place, thing, or term that redirects to them."[568]. That qouted, I think it doesnt help the reader to be redirected to Chromium(IV) oxide when looking for Chromium(III) chromate. Thats the reason I suggest Wikipedia:PROD or WP:AFD at my revert edit summary[569]. I am not sure if its noteable or nor. I found some patents at Google scholar, but... Christian75 (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
OK, I will go ahead and reinstitute the redirect and mention it. I was avoiding mentioning chromium chromate because I didnt want to give credence to this obscure and misguided term, but rules are rules, I guess. Its only Wikipedia, I keep telling myself.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
@Smokefoot: - If you think chromium chromate is obscure, just WP:RFD it (or ask me to do it). Christian75 (talk) 21:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
All sorts of wannabe chemists come out of the woodwork if I ever did that, so dont worry about it, I will think some more and solve the problem now that I understand the rules a little better, Thanks very much for the offer, very thoughtful. --Smokefoot (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

07:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

09:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

08:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Carlos Martins (disambiguation)

Only an archived talk page (and now this talk page) is pointing to Carlos Martins (disambiguation). Delete disambiguation page? SLBedit (talk) 00:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

Re: moving (renaming) articles

Thanks for this info. Didn't know it was a thing.--Lead holder (talk) 10:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

09:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

09:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Stub style, how do you know and trace my edits and find the according manual of style

Hello Christian75, as noted in the headline, how ? -- Mountainninja (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Reverting long-standing merges

You reverted a merge which occurred 6 months ago (constituting consensus that this is the stable version) at Human anatomy. There was discussion to merge Human physiology and Human anatomy to Human body, and you can look at the talk-page yourself if you want to. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

06:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

08:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

13:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for your dedication to improving and maintaining Wikipedia's standard of high quality, verifiable, encyclopedic content. AnneAllias (talk) 15:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

05:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

Hi Christian, it is not polite Wikipedia practice to move an article without an official move request and when there is an ongoing discussion at the talk page. There is no clear evidence that Aarhus River is the WP:COMMONNAME and it conflicts with the current convention for European rivers. I would be grateful if you would you arrange to move it back until there is consensus. Cheers. --Bermicourt (talk) 10:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

You moved the article first - I just moved it back until consensus ... Christian75 (talk) 10:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

16:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Enjoy!

Happy Holiday Cheer
Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an Awesome Holiday and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys! Paine

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

16:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)