Jump to content

User talk:CindyBo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page
Archive

Archives


December,2006 to April, 2007

April, 2007 to June, 2007


Empty Syntax to help with BC settlements

[edit]

Hi CindyBo,

Here is the empty syntax that I've been using from settlements in BC. It helps get things started more quickly by copy and pasting. Some parameters may need to be changed like Time zone PST to MST and "Settled" may be better changed to "Founded" or "Incorporated". Also, remember to fill in the type of settlement if it is not a city. If you have any questions/problems, ask me on my talk page as I am not going to be watching this one. —MJCdetroit 03:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<moved Settlement Infobox to my sandbox>

Moyie (sternwheeler)

[edit]

Hi CindyBo. You are off to such a great start on the article Moyie (sternwheeler) that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 18:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moyie (sternwheeler)

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 5 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Moyie (sternwheeler), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--howcheng {chat} 17:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Ship inbox

[edit]

Glad you like the infobox. The flag that would probably be used would be Image:Flag of Canada-1868-Red.svg. It was used from 1868 to 1920. You can look here if you need any other canadian flags. If need help with anything or have questions, let me know. --​​​​Dtbohrer​​​talkcontribs 13:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A detail about footnote templates

[edit]

Howdy Cindybo I don't know if you have run across this problem or found a solution to it, but if you have, please share it. --KenWalker | Talk 00:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've run across that problem a lot, but had no idea what to do with it until I read the answer to your question at the help desk. I'm not sure how many cites is considered many enough to use that template, but I tried it at BC Express (sternwheeler) and it seems to look okay. I imagine it could get to be a bit of overkill, but it's a good solution for now.CindyBotalk 06:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A later answer gave an even better approach, using the {{fp|page numbers}} template. I have rejigged the footnote you did at BX (sternwheeler) using this. I hope I didn't get any of the footnotes crossed up. BTW, I notice the BX pub link is a 404. Not sure if it is gone or just down for the moment. I am nominating this as a Good Article as I think it meets WP:WIAGA. --KenWalker | Talk 00:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the nomination and help with the footnotes, the article does look far better with the footnotes like that and the new ship infobox. I got rid of that dead link, they don't seem to have a site up anymore and it was just a couple more pictures anyway. I've been trying to fix up the footnotes on all my older articles and that new template for page numbers will be great, especially at ones like Omineca Gold Rush which is all basically from different pages of one source.CindyBotalk 01:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Plus

[edit]

I noticed when you started a new topic on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships, you edited the last topic. Rather than scrolling down to the bottom, just use the "+" tab at the top of the page. It prompts you for the new topic and also makes the edit history cleaner. HTH. --J Clear 02:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nomination

[edit]

I got a reply to that GA nomination for your BX article, check out my talk page. --KenWalker | Talk 07:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the BX's talk page and I can address the concerns there quite easily, I think. Much of that wording (and raving) is paraphrased from Willis West's book about the BC Express Company and the BX was the pride of their business. And it is honored in Prince George and remembered when the other eleven aren't, but I probably laid it on a bit thick without backing it up. I'll go over my sources here and see what I can improve.CindyBotalk 07:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I added more notes and took out the weasel worded raves. I do think it's much better. Although I'm not sure what the reviewer meant by criticisms of the boat. I've never read any criticisms of the BX, but I can't see how to cite that. Certainly Art Downs and Willis West never said a word against her, nor is there any in the local histories written by the settlers or in the local newspapers. Paddle steamers like the BX were idolized by the towns they served because they were the main lifeline to the outside world, as all other means of travel and receiving and shipping goods was horrendously difficult at the time. Even after the GTP was completed, Quesnel still needed paddle steamer service, as can be proven by the fact that the government gave the BC Express Company that subsidy to keep the BX running. So overall there's... no criticisms, but less raving :).CindyBotalk 09:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The 2a and 2c comments seem to have been addressed. This is an aspect that had not seemed to me to be a problem in the first place but with the comments from another set of expert eyes, it really does improve the tone of the article, more encyclopedic, lends credibility. The dollar references add nicely to the article. I wonder whether steamship companies had to report to any government departments that might have left a record of their finances. You would think that if they received government subsidies, they would have had to prove they needed them. If they were provincial government subsidies there might be something in some archive in Victoria. Is there anything in the sources you have that says whether it was the province or the feds or which ministry etc? I have a daughter in Victoria who I might persuade to go and root around in some archive down there but that likely wouldn't be available within the week. The "There is not much about the criticism of the boat. If there was none, say it and cite it." comment, like you, has me stumped. Is there criticism of other paddlewheelers? Some cite that where a source grumbles about them being slow or unreliable could be cited by comparison but that sounds kind of contrived to me. I have trouble figuring out how one can cite the absence of a comment. It is clear that the GA editor considers this important though. Maybe we should ask for clarification. Might be a good idea to do it early in the 7 day hold period so there is time to incorporate further suggestions. Do you want to ask for clarification? Would you like me to do that? Do you think there are any other changes to be made before we go back for help? I can't think of any. --KenWalker | Talk 15:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undoubtedly, steamers had to report their earnings, but I don't know what information there is in Victoria, or where. West researched his books quite thoroughly and their footnotes are quite specific, so that should help:

The subsidies were definitely provincial. Here's what the source, West's article The BX and the Ruxh to Fort George says:

Early in 1918 the Quesnel Board of Trade, encouraged by members of the Provincial Legislature appealed to the newly elected Brewster Administration at Victoria to grant the BC Express Company a subsidy to enable it to restore its river service between Soda Creek and Fort George. In its appeal it was pointed out that settlers along the Fraser had been promised a railway (the PGE) whose failure to materialize had caused them great suffering, since they had no way of marketing their crops. It should also be pointed out that mining in the Cariboo had become stagnant owing, partially, to the greatly increased cost equipment now that that the low steamer rate from the railway at Fort George (the GTP) was not available. As the BC Express Company was willing to re-establish the river service, provided it was guaranteed against operating losses, an arrangement was eventually consummated whereby the Provincial Government paid an annual subsidy of $10,000.

In the footnotes for that portion, West said that a letter to the Board of Trade from JM Yorston MLA dated Feb 23rd 1918 made the arrangements. And in another footnote he says that evidence of the payment can be found for only two years, in the Public Accounts for the Fiscal Year ended 31st of March, 1919, Victoria, 1920, page C221. And the other can also be found in Public Accounts for the Fiscal Year ended 31st of March, 1920, Victoria, 1921, page B224.

I think if there was solid information on what the BX made each year, West would have put that information in his books. He was the General Manager of the BC Express Company from 1903 until 1921. Though he comments on the $7,000 loss for 1915, he doesn't get into other specifics other than commenting on that June where the BX made $15,000. It could be that some of this information is lost forever.

As for the criticism, there was rivalry, of course, among the BC Express Company boats and the privately owned ones and the railway's boats. They raced eachother, but they didn't seem to criticize each other, either you could make a go out of it in the business or you couldn't. The GTP and the BC Express had issues, with Millar trying to buy Prince George and the GTP lowering its bridges on the route from Fort George to Tete Jaune Cache, but none of that is a criticism of the BX, nor did it affect her route, but only the route of her sister ship, the BC Express (sternwheeler), where I get into that a bit more. So, no, I still can't think of any criticism. Maybe you should get him to clarify.

Certainly the local papers raved about her:

the BX arrived today and half the populace was at the Landing to meet her,

the BX brought in a shipment of beef today,

a dinner for Captain Browne and the crew of the BX was held last night

and so on ad infinutum.... .CindyBotalk 19:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I found a good old article in the South Fort George Herald dated November 5th, 1910, that gives a hint of Fort George's feelings for the BX.
A complimentary dinner was tendered for the officers and crew of the BX by the residents of South Fort George and the adjoining townsites last Saturday evening at the newly completed Hotel Northern.The event took the nature of a Thanksgiving offering at the resusitation of this fine riverboat from her recent mishap which at the time looked as though a resumption for this year would be out of the question. Any other company but this admirable "clock of precision" would have forgone the two trips made after the accident and berthed the boat for the winter. But the BX Compny is a system with a system brought to perfection through fifty years of mastery on the longest and best stage line in existence. And furthermore the officers of this new boat has imbibed the principles of the land chain of the old organization by bringing up to South Fort George the largest tonnage ever carried on the Fraser above Soda Creek- 90 tons. This enterprise on the part of the transportation company led the philanthropic merchants to heroic deeds which resulting in grouping of the officers and crew in the dining room of our prohibition hotel, (the Northerm didn't have a liquor licence until that December) and in dry wit, dry song and still drier toasts, made plain their appreciation of their efforts at the termination of navigation. The representative of Honorable Adventurers spoke touchingly and feelingly of the hardships encountered by the bold navigators of the Fraser from the time of Simon Fraser to Captain Browne, but lamented the fact that a wave was creeping over the country that had for its ultimate object the dethroning of an admirable aid to social felicity.
  • The two trips they're talking about the BX making are the two that Browne made before the Chilco (sternwheeler) was beached just north of Quesnel with Fort George's winter food supply. The BX actually went back to Quesnel for the winter, but when petitioned to make one more trip with food supplies, returned to Fort George in early December.CindyBotalk 20:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See comment from MouseNightshirt on my talk page --KenWalker | Talk 21:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See comment from MouseNightshirt about source for infobox --KenWalker | Talk 15:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More from MN on my talk patge--KenWalker | Talk 19:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, check out Talk:BX (sternwheeler) if you haven't already! --KenWalker | Talk 00:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I just spotted that myself. I'm glad it passed. There's a bit more to the GA process than I thought. I saw on the BC Wikiproject that that's on your to-do list: to get some of the BC "B" articles to GA. I don't think I have anything else quite up to that standard yet, BC Express (sternwheeler), is the closest probably, but not really cited enough. I'm working on Barnard's Express this week, and (using what I've learned lately), I'll cite it properly and maybe we can get it there soon too.CindyBotalk 00:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cindy

[edit]

As you no doubt have noted by now I'm temporarily back; not sure if you've got Chinaman on your watchlist but check out its talkpage; I wonder if Hong will accuse me of uncivility or whatever; we'll see, but let's just say I talked like a Cariboozer in responding to him just now. It's my culture - that's what multiculturalism is all about enit? ;-)Skookum1 04:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 22 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ainsworth, British Columbia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--Carabinieri 17:22, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Updated DYK query On July 26, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christina Lake, British Columbia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi Cindy and thanks for all your BC contributions. AHppy editing and keep it up. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Updated DYK query On July 27, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cascade City, British Columbia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
You're on a roll! Happy editing and keep up the good work! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image help

[edit]

I'll keep resizing if needed in mind for the future, it was driving me nuts! --BrokenSphere 18:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moyie, British Columbia

[edit]

Hi CindyBo. You are off to such a great start on the article Moyie, British Columbia that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 17:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need a new class of article for Moyie, British Columbia. Class=T. For terrific. Very well done and most interesting. Thanks for doing it.--KenWalker | Talk 05:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 31 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Moyie, British Columbia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--Yomanganitalk 23:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Updated DYK query On August 14, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nicolas Coccola, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Trixie_and_Dean_Koontz.jpg

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Trixie_and_Dean_Koontz.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 13:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am disputing this tagging. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T.J. Potter and Oregon Steamboat

[edit]

Your page is wonderful. I'm working on some of the Oregon steamboats and steamboat lines. My little contributions so far are T.J. Potter, Wide West, and Shaver Transportation Company. I'm also trying to develop some templates for basic information on steamboats etc., but my technical skill is sadly insufficient. mtsmallwood —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtsmallwood (talkcontribs) 23:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RMS BX and BC Express at South Fort George.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:RMS BX and BC Express at South Fort George.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minto page?

[edit]

Your Moyie page is great. I was thinking about putting something together for the Minto, which would perhaps be the beginning of an Arrow Lakes steamboat page. I can't find anything on Minto in Wikipedia outside of your Moyie page. Are you aware of an existing page? Mtsmallwood (talk) 23:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda far from your turf but just a heads-up on it, if you've anything maybe to add. There was a discussion on the Kamloops-Alexandria route in Robin Skelton's This is Cariboo and I think a map; I think it went via Deadman's Creek and Bridge Lake; would be good to get/have a map; also the Fraser Canyon route I think there's at least a heritage sign, part of the trail may actually be preserved, or located anyway; like the Lillooet Cattle Trail it was narrow and steep and switchbacked and a lot of animals died trying to pack over the route; a waste of money, much trumped in our histories, but largely pointless....any cats or fixes you could add pls do. NB Category:Historic trails and roads in Canada in case there's anything like an an Omimeca or Cassiar Trail....I guess Collins Overland Telegraph almost is required as that's where Telegraph Trail redirects to I think....Skookum1 (talk) 16:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On a similar here's-some-more-work-for-you tangent, please see Talk:Alfred Waddington.Skookum1 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
and re the Telegraph Trail, that's currently a redirect to an article on the John Wayne movie The Telegraph Trail. At some point we'll need to have an article, not sure where to start; kind of in your neck of the woods, no?Skookum1 (talk) 17:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
er, that's weird it was a redirect when I tried it last time; redlink now; or waitaminit no I found the movie from the search results, not a redirect.Skookum1 (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI re mining districts

[edit]

Figure you might have something to say about this, or at least find the map useful...Skookum1 (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo cindy

[edit]

Hey...how's wedded bliss going? Just trying to remember - somewhere, to someone, this summer, I gave/loaned by old BC govt publication Water Powers......was it you? It has hydrologic flow rates for various rivers; looking for info on the Blaeberry, Spillimacheen, Canoe, Kicking Horse, Kinbasket, Bush, Wood, Goldstream etc tribs of the Columbia for Talk:Columbia River and its article page...haven't seen a lot of edits from you lately so expededct you're on honeymoon, or otherwise living in the real world....Skookum1 (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guess you're still living in the real world ;-) Just thought you might to have a gander at {{Arrow Lakes Steamboats}} and note the "other routes" sections...is Steamboats of the Peace River worth it? Were there any on the Omineca or Finlay btw?Skookum1 (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Omineca Rush served by Tatla Lake area, and portages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 10:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Meetup Invite

[edit]
Wikimedia Vancouver Meetup

Please come to an informal gathering of Vancouver Wikipedians, Monday, May 5 at 6:30 pm. It will be at Benny's Bagels, 2505 West Broadway. We'd love to see you there, and please invite others! Watch the Vancouver Meetup page for details.

This box: view  talk  edit

Regards, Mkdwtalk 22:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP user 24.p.eng.bc

[edit]

Hi Cindy; thought I'd take this opportunity to introduce you to lurker extraordinaire sf sorrow, signs sfs and is usually a 24. IP address; he doesnt' ahve good wiki manners and is just a raw rook but he means well and knows all kinds of stuff, and thank heavens has a sense of humour; sfs, I'f forgotten your background but it's in industry, no? i.e. engineering or commerce or ?? Not government, surely?Skookum1 (talk) 05:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Wiki Manners ? do they exist? what are they ? Are they an extension of real manners, cuz I don't have those either. Manana. How do I get a Mr PG Award? Is there an Uncle Ben's Brew Award? Hi Cindy Bo. this is SFS. I skulk the sewers of Wiki, passing pithy comments on pages and such. To work. Boats on Peace. Chex out Frontier Days in BC, c 1972. There is chapter on same. and the book. Land of 12 foot davis. More details. There is an excellent Edmntn Historian who wrote a detailed history of N. Alberta and rivers; c. 1980. forgotten name. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 10:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Landseer by the way, I always wanted a Newfoundland dog, big black and drooly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 11:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have a complete Times History of the War [WW1}, 20 volume set bound in sumptuous red cloth? Willing to lend volumes. etc etc. I have a MacMillan history. (Bloody annoying but boffo graphics) a Colliers, and a Groliers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 11:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SFS. Nice to meet you. It sounds as if we have some interests in commom. I've heard of Land of 12 Foot Davis, but haven't been able to find a copy. No, I'm not in government, thank goodness, I manage a large liquor store, which is undoubtedly less tedious. So what types of articles have you been working on?CindyBotalk 04:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chex out the Steamboats of the Peace River page. sfs Now only to do the Red, Saskatchewan, Yukon and MacKenzie rivers....ugh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 02:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Trixie Koontz

[edit]

I wasn't aware of the thread earlier. If you wish to restore the section, feel free to revert my edit, but I think you should consider renaming the section from "Trixie Koontz" to "Inspiration" and slightly altering the information in the section. Then you could remove the "off topic" tag, and it would fit into the article well. Cheers! Malinaccier (talk) 22:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Help !!

[edit]

Cindi Lou... I will need some help with the Steamboats of the Yukon River; and Mississippi. feel free to write away.

I think Peace and MacKZie are for all intents and purposes finished. PHotos could be added for garnish. sfs

I will see what I can do. I have many good online photo sources and I'm pretty sure I can find some material on the Yukon, although the Mississippi may be a bit tougher and is bound to be a big project. Maybe User:mtsmallwood will have some ideas on where to start with that. He has done some amazing work on steamboats articles . See Steamboats of the Columbia River as an example and he made some of the templates you see at the bottom of the steamboat articles.CindyBotalk 07:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cin, ( any relation to Dr. Syn? ) I just started the Yukon and Miss. pages to get them started. I was alarmed that they didn't exist. It will take a year or more to whip into shape. I don't have much on the Miss. someone east will have. MTSmallwood work is beyond excellent. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


There isn't much on Steamboats on the Shushwap either. Perhaps we could write one called Shagboats on the Shuswap..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 15:54, 2 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Leave that one to me, please; I've got a series of resource links on it and just keep in getting distracted by other topic areas - workign title is Steamboats of the Thompson and Shuswap because of hte interconnectedness and shared services ("the Thompson" as a term can include Kamloops Lake of course). Steamboats of Lake Okanagan I started but just as a raw stub listing vessels; Steamboats of Skaha Lake could maybe be in the same article (there were only two); Steamboats of Slocan Lake is also tehre waiting to be written, and there's title-problems with Steamboats of the Upper Columbia and Kootenaay Rivers which I haven't figured out yet (Americans use "Upper Columbia" to mean a lower stretch of the Columbia south of Wenatchee....and Steamboats of the Kootenai River and Kootenay Lake is a different area. Vessels of the Lakes Route is another one I should get at as well as Steamboats of the Lower Fraser River and Gulf of Georgia (which would include Harrison and Pitt Lakes....). Steamboats of the Stikine River is also needed, though interconnected with what might be Steamboats of the Inside Passage (see Mosquito Fleet, which has an overlap of ships/topics).Skookum1 (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, yeah, I'd say there's plenty of work for everyone. I'll see what I can do for the Yukon, after the weekend... it's hot and sunny here (beer drinking weather) and I'm going to be Busier than a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs, but on Tuesday, I'll make a start on it and upload some suitable pictures for some of these articles.CindyBotalk 17:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my humour is wasted on you lot. I threw a bunch of stuff on Miss. together but some clown deleted it and put it on redirect. Thus I have written a bunch more and left it both on sb of the Miss talk an 24...talk. for the moment till it is readable and showable. Drinkin' an' Uncle Ben's stubbie then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 22:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, just a Corona. Yes, deletions and redirects happen all the time to new articles. One good way to work on an article is to create a user page for yourself to write drafts in, which is called a sandbox. For example you could create User:SFS/sandbox and write all you want without fear of deletion. Then when the article is ready you copy and paste it over to Steamboats of the Mississippi River (or whatever). Another way is to put the tag {{underconstruction}} on the top of the article, so that everyone knows that it is a work in progress.CindyBotalk 06:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox? Redirects? who thought this up? The neighbour's cat has a sandbox and does all sorts of icky things there.sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes, and that's why Wikipedia sandboxes exist; to keep the icky stuff away from admins who'd otherwise delete it while you're working on it. I have a few - User:Skookum1/Sandbox is my latest; because you have an account User:Sfsorrow2 you can start a page User:Sfsorrow2/Sandbox and jot away to your heart's content without anyone butting in (unless you invite them).Skookum1 (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS Steamboats of the Yukon River I just added various cats and stubs and the respective WikiProject templates to; note the WikiProject templates will attract attention from content-minded editors as opposed to nit-picking finicky-admin editors.....Skookum1 (talk) 16:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ooo. Steamboats of the Mississippi River redirects to Steamboats....that's not good. Probably best to raise this on Talk:Steamboats of the Columbia River to get MTSmallwood's attention and also that of other steamboat-minded contributors; a major gap in the set I'd say, no? Steamboats of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers also strikes me as needed; maybe there's Steamboats of the Sacramento River though.....Skookum1 (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I left a message on User talk:NawlinWiki talk page about the redirect.[1] Undoubtedly he was unaware that this article would be part of an established set... and I asked him to change the redirect so Steamboats of the Mississippi can be called Steamboats of the Mississippi River again. I think that only administrators can change redirects and luckily he is one.CindyBotalk 07:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cin n Skook, Hmmm. Now we'll give wiki servers conniptions. There are two SB of the Miss. articles now. The one Neworn nuked. And a new, longer one I put up demain. If you access sb of miss on this talk page you get redirect. I you do a search it will pull up new, must have a later different internal file listing. Who know what evil lurks in the minds of wiki.... sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Try this link. Steamboats of the Mississippi sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you at least try to obey naming conventions and include "River" in the title, as with our other steamboat articles? This will probably take a name-rename debate to fix now.....sigh. You've also got to learn to add categories to try to make your new articles more "presentable" for cruising admins and readers alike; didn't know you'd had one deleted, but most likely it's because you're not posting wiki-style articles; lots of detail and you've learned some stuff about headings; I'll probably create a Category:Steamboat articles by region or the like for all these lake/river steamboat articles to be in....I added the US WikiProject and WP Ships which should get teh appropriate attention from editors who can work on the linking/copy-editing, I don't ahve time (I'm working on editing music tracks for an upcoming first-CD....).Skookum1 (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Actually, the naming mishap works to our advantage. the 2 articles wont be confused for the moment. Did you actually read the article? Presentable? Conventions? Categories ? mere wiki twaddle. Content Content Content Pal. My head is too loaded with writing and research to worry about such ephemera. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what you mean about the articles not getting confused; I just changed Steamboats of the Mississippi River to a redirect to your new article. No time to read/think about your content, don't know Mimsissippi history well enough to kibbitz; could you at least help the wikification process and try and link names/events in the article, and also put italics on all the vessel-names?Skookum1 (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Again, don't know much history but suspect that Steamboats of the Ohio River is also called for, not sure about the Arkansas and Missouri Rivers, or the Platte, but likely so.....Skookum1 (talk) 17:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes each branch of river needs an article. Don't get your shorts into a diamond hitch, the article has only been there 12 hours. Wikidressing and pinstriping will be done, as will each tributary. The page will take time. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try at least to add and while you're typing the draft, and learn to automatically add the double apostrophes on either side of shipnames to make italics; saves time/hunting later on. I'm not getting my knickers tight, I'm just trying to teach you how to contribute efficiently to Wikipedia, and that means not leaving doo-doo in your wake for others to cleanup; yes, only 12 hours, but that's an eternity in wikidom as you've already found out from speedy deletes (they've done it to me, too, can't remmber which town it was but "blip" it was gone as I hadn't added cats or refs yet; within five minutes...no, two minutes...). Grammar and other stuff regular editors can fix, but just try and link and italicize as you're writing; either that or use "Preview" before you post, or your User:Sfsorrow/Sandbox, and add the links/italics after you're done drafting the text, then post it....Please.Skookum1 (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I find it easier to read without the wikiwash, having cut my teeth on encyclopaedias; otherwise it looks like someone broke a Bic pen over the page. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 20:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then don't bitch when something gets deleted or you get actions on the page you don't like; you don't own the work, remember that, anybody can edit and many will over time. If you don't make 'em right, don't expect 'em to stand various kinds of admin challenges; at least learn about cats and proper titling and such, but if you want draft 'em on a sandbox and invite other editors to edit them there before you post them; that way they definitely won't get deleted or otherwise too much immediately mucked with. Either do that, or don't complain; good work in story, bit colloquial for what will eventually be edited to wiki-speak in spots, and good narrative; but provide refs - jsut a list of which books you used to write it from, or even ones you remmbeer reading.Skookum1 (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Mesachie One. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 21:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the topic of naming conventions, I finally remembered to move Steamboats of the Upper Fraser River in British Columbia to Steamboats of the Upper Fraser River. That was another odd one. Oh well, we all live and learn. :)CindyBotalk 00:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Off topic again here, but have either of you come across much on Bishop Emile Grouard? I was adding some notes to the Steamboats of the Peace River page and came across this tantalizing paragraph in my source Pioneer Days in British Columbia. "The vessel (St Charles) reflected the vitality of Bishop Grouard, probably the best known of all the northern priests and one of Canada's great frontiersmen. For nearly seventy years, from 1862, he served the Indians and the Eskimos travelling tens of thousands of miles by foot and snowshoe, dogteam and canoe." Sounds like another article in the making. Gotta love our notable pioneers. They certainly keep us busy.CindyBotalk 05:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's not ours, he belongs to Alberta. Try Grouard, AB, much in Peace area on him. See McGregor, talk sb of Peace. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 05:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. But I see that there's not even a Grouard, Alberta article yet either. Oh well, hopefully the Alberta wikipedians have it all on their to do list. Looks like Bishop Grouard could be an interesting biography to work on. I've crossed the border to Alberta a few times in my interests. I worked on Patrick Burns (businessman), for example. But we've plenty to do here yet, as I'm sure you noticed. Every time a new article is started, it uncovers a dozen new ones that need creating.CindyBotalk 06:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case I missed any...

[edit]

Hi Cin; check out Category:Communities on the Fraser River which I made today as the "cities" one bugged me; I realize now I missed Alexandria and I think Hixon and Red Bluff may have articles. Any Prince George neighbourhoods or riverside community/locality articles should go on it - is Fort George (however dabbed) a separate article? I've forgotten; just letting you know it exists.....Skookum1 (talk) 04:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no Fort George article, as far as I know. There is South Fort George, but Central Fort George (when I finally finish it) was on the Nechako. And there's Giscome Portage (if that qualifies as a community). I'll keep thinking on it.CindyBotalk 04:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of categories. Do I have all the correct ones on the Phoenix, British Columbia article I just finished? I know there's some new regional ones.CindyBotalk 05:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CIN

take me a pic of blue sky and orange Aspens. I've been busy with things, Ob River, Danube,Rhine, St Lawrence, Yangtze Bolivia etc Been meening to get back to Yukon but maybe when it is grey and rainy. tell me more about the necchaco and chilco boats. sfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 15:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Nechacco (sternwheeler) and Chilco (sternwheeler) were the same one. I don't know much more than what I put in the article, but on a talk page I am free to speculate and talk about original research. We do know that she was called the "Pathfinder of the North" and certainly earned that under Captain Bonser, who was already rather famous (or perhaps infamous) for his role in the race on the Skeena. Anyway, she was the first sternwheeler to make it up the Fraser past the Grand Canyon of the Fraser. It was considered a fearsome canyon in the day, 30-60 scowmen were drowned there every season during rail construction. She was also the only sternwheeler, other than the Enterprise to make it to Takla Landing, another spectacular feat. Later she was renamed the Chilco, something to do with registration problems. She was very popular at the time and often chartered by Frank Swannell, who undoubtedly took her all over the place. (That fellow's picture should be next to the word Pioneer in the dictionary). Anyway, the BX is far better remembered here, but the Chilco had just as interesting a story and a more dramatic end. Her second captain, George Ritchie isn't recalled in any histories that I've come across, but he was probably less experienced than Bonser (or perhaps he was just a bit too bold), as he took the Chilco down to Quesnel and tried to take her back to Prince George in late November and she got damaged and had to sit in the river for the winter. She was carrying all of South Fort George's winter food supplies at the time and two of our pioneer residents had to hike down to Quesnel and beg Captain Owen Forrester Browne to do one more run with the BX so they could make it through the winter. Come spring, Ritchie spent a few weeks repairing the Chilco, but he left too early and she was smashed to pieces in an ice jam and the crew had to escape out on the ice. Not one board was ever recovered.

And actually I wouldn't know an aspen from a poplar :). I guess I'll have to look it up. I'm in the right place, I guess. Talk to you later. CindyBotalk 04:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Why you could try Wikipedia, to help you...zounds ! eh? Aspens are small and round and quiver in the wind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, here's a video, even better than a pic and I didn't even have to upload it myself. New steamboat articles look great by the way.CindyBotalk 06:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey cin, you with the over the top wiki moniker that makes a Mexican pre-school look monochromatic. Orange aspens, blue sky. Forgive me, it is a coastal thing,when you are surrounded by green hemlocks and grey skies, the interior forest is heaven. Rain here again today. thanks for the plaudits. I am still not happy with a few articles but have to wait. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cariboo Camels

[edit]

Your article on Cariboo Camels is simply sublime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.207.147 (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Cataline's Mule Train at Hazelton.gif

[edit]

File:Cataline's Mule Train at Hazelton.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Cataline's Mule Train at Hazelton.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Cataline's Mule Train at Hazelton.gif]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golden's St. Paul's Anglican Church.gif is now available as Commons:File:Golden's St. Paul's Anglican Church.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hazelton Bank Robbery.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hazelton Bank Robbery.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hazelton as Clubhouse.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hazelton as Clubhouse.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hazelton Hospital.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hazelton Hospital.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hazelton sternwheeler.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hazelton sternwheeler.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hazelton at Kitselas Canyon.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hazelton at Kitselas Canyon.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Henry Irwin.gif is now available as Commons:File:Henry Irwin.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hotel Northern.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hotel Northern.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hudson's Bay Post at Fort George.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hudson's Bay Post at Fort George.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hydraulic Mine at Manson's Creek.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hydraulic Mine at Manson's Creek.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Inlander at Kitselas Canyon.gif is now available as Commons:File:Inlander at Kitselas Canyon.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:JH Sullivan.gif is now available as Commons:File:JH Sullivan.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:James May and Ezra Evans.gif is now available as Commons:File:James May and Ezra Evans.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:John Houston.gif is now available as Commons:File:John Houston.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:John Irving 1873.gif is now available as Commons:File:John Irving 1873.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Kaslo, British Columbia 1946.gif is now available as Commons:File:Kaslo, British Columbia 1946.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Kitselas Canyon.gif is now available as Commons:File:Kitselas Canyon.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Lejac Residential School.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Lejac Residential School.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Millar Addition.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Millar Addition.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Moving to Prince George.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Moving to Prince George.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mining Recorder's Cabin at Manson Creek.gif is now available as Commons:File:Mining Recorder's Cabin at Manson Creek.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Moyie and Kuskanook on Kootenay Lake.gif is now available as Commons:File:Moyie and Kuskanook on Kootenay Lake.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mule Train at Quesnel River.gif is now available as Commons:File:Mule Train at Quesnel River.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Natural Resources Security Co.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Natural Resources Security Co.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nechacco on Nechako River 1909.gif is now available as Commons:File:Nechacco on Nechako River 1909.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nicolas Coccola.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Nicolas Coccola.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:New Hazelton.gif is now available as Commons:File:New Hazelton.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Northland Echo.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Northland Echo (1).jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Omineca River.gif is now available as Commons:File:Omineca River.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Operator and Conveyor at Fort George.gif is now available as Commons:File:Operator and Conveyor at Fort George.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Operator on Skeena.gif is now available as Commons:File:Operator on Skeena.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Parliament Buildings at Victoria.gif is now available as Commons:File:Parliament Buildings at Victoria.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Phoenix War Memorial.gif is now available as Commons:File:Phoenix War Memorial.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Phoenix, British Columbia.gif is now available as Commons:File:Phoenix, British Columbia.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Port Essington.gif is now available as Commons:File:Port Essington.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pat Burns.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Pat Burns.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Porter Landing, Cassiar, British Columbia.gif is now available as Commons:File:Porter Landing, Cassiar, British Columbia.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Portaging a canoe up the Finlay River.gif is now available as Commons:File:Portaging a canoe up the Finlay River.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Powerhouse in Cascade.gif is now available as Commons:File:Powerhouse in Cascade.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Quesnel Forks.gif is now available as Commons:File:Quesnel Forks.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Prince George 1930's.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Prince George 1930's.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Quesnel Lake.gif is now available as Commons:File:Quesnel Lake.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Quesnel at Fort George.gif is now available as Commons:File:Quesnel at Fort George.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:R.P. Rithet at Yale.gif is now available as Commons:File:R.P. Rithet at Yale.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Reliance at Yale.gif is now available as Commons:File:Reliance at Yale.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Robert C Hammond.gif is now available as Commons:File:Robert C Hammond.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Robert C Hammond.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Robert C Hammond.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:SS BX Sunk at Woodpecker.gif is now available as Commons:File:SS BX Sunk at Woodpecker.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:SS Ainsworth.gif is now available as Commons:File:SS Ainsworth.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:SS Distributor, Skeena, Operator and Conveyor.gif is now available as Commons:File:SS Distributor, Skeena, Operator and Conveyor.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:SS Peace River.gif is now available as Commons:File:SS Peace River.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Scow in Grand Canyon.gif is now available as Commons:File:Scow in Grand Canyon.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Simon Gunanoot and the Hazelton Police Force 1919.gif is now available as Commons:File:Simon Gunanoot and the Hazelton Police Force 1919.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:SS Port Simpson.gif is now available as Commons:File:SS Port Simpson.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Simon Gunanoot.gif is now available as Commons:File:Simon Gunanoot.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Skuzzy on Fraser.gif is now available as Commons:File:Skuzzy on Fraser.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Slate Creek 1933.gif is now available as Commons:File:Slate Creek 1933.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Soda Creek 1914.gif is now available as Commons:File:Soda Creek 1914.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Soda Creek Main Street.gif is now available as Commons:File:Soda Creek Main Street.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Soda Creek on Fraser.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Soda Creek on Fraser.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:South Fort George Landing.jpg is now available as Commons:File:South Fort George Landing.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sperry Cline.gif is now available as Commons:File:Sperry Cline.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:St. Eugene Mining Company in Moyie.gif is now available as Commons:File:St. Eugene Mining Company in Moyie.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:St. Eugene Mission.gif is now available as Commons:File:St. Eugene Mission.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stage with driver Stephen Tingley.gif is now available as Commons:File:Stage with driver Stephen Tingley.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stephen Tingley.gif is now available as Commons:File:Stephen Tingley.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sternwheeler Gertrude at Telegraph Creek.gif is now available as Commons:File:Sternwheeler Gertrude at Telegraph Creek.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sternwheeler Western Slope at Yale.gif is now available as Commons:File:Sternwheeler Western Slope at Yale.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stikine River.gif is now available as Commons:File:Stikine River.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sternwheeler William Irving at Yale.gif is now available as Commons:File:Sternwheeler William Irving at Yale.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tariff Mine near Ainsworth.gif is now available as Commons:File:Tariff Mine near Ainsworth.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Swannell's pack train at the Omineca Mountains.gif is now available as Commons:File:Swannell's pack train at the Omineca Mountains.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 10

[edit]

Quixotic plea

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 04:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

[edit]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cataline.jpg

[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Cataline.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Colin Kinsley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]