User talk:Claireatwaves

This is Claireatwaves's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: BRE Academy (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quasar G. was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most sources are primary, or simple passing mentions. More reliable, secondary sources (likes news articles) are required to demonstrate notability. Also, instead of including external links in the body of the article, use footnotes to cite your sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BRE Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quasar G ^{t - c} 13:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Claireatwaves, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Quasar G ^{t - c} 13:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BRE Academy

Hello, Claireatwaves. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BRE Academy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mark Lewis (designer), from its old location at User:Claireatwaves/Mark St John Lewis. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For deletion - focussing on the Mark St John Lewis entry

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Lewis (designer) (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Lewis (designer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Lewis (designer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark St John Lewis (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

Copy of the recently-declined Draft:Mark Lewis (designer). Please focus on a single draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark St John Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark St John Lewis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted - this is the worked on draft, the other is marked for deletion

Editing with a possible paid conflict of interest

Hello Claireatwaves. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Claireatwaves. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Claireatwaves|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --SamHolt6 (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC) Claireatwaves (talk) 11:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved, I hope - apologies. Mark is a family friend, so I'd missed declaring. I have marked this at the top of the article now

AfC notification: Draft:Mark St John Lewis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark St John Lewis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:35, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Mark St John Lewis, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Claireatwaves, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Claireatwaves|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claireatwaves (talk) 11:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC) HI, this was done. The original Mark Lewis entry has been proposed for deletion.[reply]

My interest is not financial, but HAS been declared

All the references are now inline and have been beefed up with further references and links.

I hope it now reads ok.

I also have a picture to add - I have confirmation from a photographer that we can use their image copyright free and will upload this over the weekend.

Thanks for your patience - let me know if there is anything else I need to do.

I have a page to put up on Adult grooming as well so while it's unrelated, this learning process won't have been wasted.

THank you Claire

AfC notification: Draft:Mark St John Lewis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark St John Lewis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:04, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark St John Lewis (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Mark Lewis (designer), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark St John Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark St John Lewis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PLease can this one be considered - I marked the other one for deletion THanks Claire

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark St John Lewis (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The biography section is completely unsourced so are large portions of the rest, ALL content requires sourcing, we have no interest in what you know only what reliable sources have reported on the subject

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark St John Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark St John Lewis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hi there - just acknowledging that I got your email, but I think if any further discussion on that topic needs to happen it should be on the article's talk page. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark St John Lewis (June 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is not written in a neutral encyclopedic tone, even after three previous revisions. There seems to be clear coi involved, andan acceptable article would need to be started fro mscratch, by an editor without such COI.

DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Lewis (designer)

Hello, Claireatwaves. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Lewis (designer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark St John Lewis

Hello, Claireatwaves. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark St John Lewis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]