User talk:Classic-Cartoons

Classic-Cartoons, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Classic-Cartoons! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Bbb23 (talk) 17:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Emergency Broadcast System, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sjö (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at WFAA, you may be blocked from editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at WCLL-CD. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Fairfax, Virginia. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the plot summary of a work have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Trivialist (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at WFAA, you may be blocked from editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chuck E. Cheese (character). Binksternet (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding YouTube as a source

Hi Classic-Cartoons,

thank you very much for reverting your recent addition to the Broadcast signal intrusion article.

As you have hopefully correctly noticed, most YouTube channels are not reliable sources, because they are self-published and usually do not meet Wikipedia's standards for article sources.

Further details can be found at WP:RSP, a list of sources that also contains an informative entry about YouTube.

Please be more careful in advance next time. As this has been a persistent problem in the past, leading to two blocks, please carefully avoid being blocked from editing, indefinitely, for not having learned from these mistakes after all the time.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WNOL-TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Call me when you get the chance 22:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Stunting (broadcasting), you may be blocked from editing. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lisa's Sax. Call me when you get the chance 16:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: While we're at it, let's also ban Classic-Cartoons from Commons; he has been uploading non-free images as his "own work", and also poorly drawn derivative works of non-free logos with no educational value. See his Commons talk page. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mvcg66b3r, thanks for dealing with the Commons copyright issues. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, But he's still there; the questionable files haven't been removed yet. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't change that.

Such requests are usually handled quickly, though. Give them 24 hours. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I meant commons:Template:Copyvio. These are handled quickly. The template is only for very obvious cases, however. Now that discussions exist, you need to wait for them to be closed. This may take multiple months. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]