User talk:Cobyan02069
Nomination of Central Connecticut Soccer Field for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central Connecticut Soccer Field is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Connecticut Soccer Field until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Cobyan02069, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Cobyan02069! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC) |
BS
[edit]Thanx muchly for the barnstar... I have to admit that it probably well-deserved... LOL GWFrog (talk) 04:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at VCU Rams men's soccer, 2000–09.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Do not recreate articles recently deleted at AfD. Not only was there an AfD where concensus was gained that these seasons were not notable, there was also a DRV which endorsed this decision. Amalgamating non-notable articles does not make them notable per NSEASONS, the amalgamation still has to show wider GNG. If you think you can show this, you should create in your user space and submit to AfC. Fenix down (talk) 14:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Unblock request
[edit]
- Cobyan02069 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- Cobyan02069 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "GLenhart1". The reason given for GLenhart1's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".
- Blocking administrator: Fenix down (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: Please explain your relationship with GLenhart1; you've been editing on the same IP, in quick succession. One might also wonder about the other users on your IP, all of whom seem similarly concerned with college sports. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 15:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- None. Cobyan02069 (talk) 15:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Well, then, autoblock seems to be working as designed. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 16:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- None. Cobyan02069 (talk) 15:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 2002 UCLA Bruins men's soccer team
- added links pointing to Saint Louis and Tom Fitzgerald
- 2017 FC Dallas season
- added a link pointing to Carlos Gruezo
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Editing another User's Sandbox
[edit]
Hello, I'm Quidster4040. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Quidster4040 (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
CSOC Team Season Article Template
[edit]Hey Cobyan,
I have begun a template to use for college men's soccer season articles. You can find it here, if you have any ideas to improve the article, be sure to leave a comment on the talk page. Thanks! Quidster4040 (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:1985 UCLA Bruins men's soccer team
[edit]
Hello, Cobyan02069. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1985 UCLA Bruins men's soccer team".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 13:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit]
Your recent editing history at 2018 MAAC Men's Soccer Tournament shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The only reason I have not yet blocked you is that you have not been previously warned. Repeated reverts without any attempts to discuss the dispute are disruptive, and if you make any further reverts without first reaching a consensus on the talk page, you are likely to be blocked. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ahem. What seems to be the problem. The page was redirected per an AFD discussion. Why are you undoing this amid cries of "vandalism". I have protected the page so y'all can discuss the matter on the article's talk page. Please bear in mind that further edit warring will result in you being blocked from editing.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"...went to the lengths to made sock accounts trying to block him"--that is a pretty serious accusation, and it requires evidence. Either provide that, or strike the comment. In the meantime I'm hatting it. Drmies (talk) 15:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.