User talk:Confermation

Confermation, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Confermation! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

review articles Hi, I made two articles about two series, please review them so that if you confirm, you can direct them to the main space. Both series are being broadcast in Iran, and therefore there is not enough information about it in Google. That's why I made these articles to make the right information available to the public Confermation (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Draft:Uncensored With Ali Tajdary, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files cannot be used in the draft namespace per non-free content use criterion #9 as explained here. The file can be re-added if the draft is accepted as an article, but it shouldn’t be re-added before then. If you gave any questions about this feel free to ask them below or here. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marchjuly hello, thank you for your information, i did not know that no poster should be added in the draft space. i apologize for returning the poster.--Confermation (talk) 12:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uncensored With Ali Tajdary (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncensored With Ali Tajdary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uncensored With Ali Tajdary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uncensored With Ali Tajdary, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 13:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hoseinkandovan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoseinkandovan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/they) 00:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TNT hi sir, i do not know the reason for my blocking, but maybe it is because i created an article that was previously made by hossein kandovan, that hossein kandovan has been blocked has nothing to do with his articles, i felt he was because of the war he has been blocked by several users and insults to them, and this issue has nothing to do with his articles,for example, the series (special line) is being broadcast on iranian television. many people want to make an article related to this series, but they have nothing to do with hossein kandovan.incidentally, i knew that these two series were made by hossein kandovan, and because he was blocked, the series was labeled (g5) and deleted for no reason.Please do not delete articles due to user errors,Usually all articles that get the (g5) tag are removed while many of them are valuable articles.My reason for re-creating these two articles was this issue,I did not know if it was illegal to make articles that were previously removed due to (g5).--Confermation (talk) 09:41, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Confermation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi I'm still blocked while I did not do anything wrong, I just created two articles that were previously written by the person who was a sock, I was blocked without any error, please remove me from the block, I have nothing to do with Hossein kondovan.Confermation (talk)

Decline reason:

"I just created two articles that were previously written by the person who was a sock" ... well, fancy that! What an amazing coincidence! You are more correct than you realize when you say you were "blocked without any error". (And snark aside, I find the evidence at the SPI convincing and of course defer to whatever the checkusers found) — Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.