User talk:Corsulian

List of Fraternities and Sororities at George Mason University

Hello. I was wondering if we could talk a minute about your List of Fraternities and Sororities at George Mason University page. You have done a great with the page over time. I feel have some good information to add, but I would like to discuss it with you off line first. It pertains to Sigma Chi - Iota Xi Chapter. I am authoritative on this chapter from inception in 1985 (colony) through current. Please contact me at liamknuj4321@hotmail.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.105.174 (talk) 14:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Notable Phi Sigma Kappa Brothers

Hello. I've noticed you have created an article List of Notable Phi Sigma Kappa Brothers This appears to be a duplicate of the list at Phi Sigma Kappa. Is it your intention that the new article should replace the list on the main article or stand alongside it?B1atv 17:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're fast. I created List of Notable Phi Sigma Kappa Brothers before deleting the list from the Phi Sigma Kappa page. Corsulian

Thanks for your response and I'm sorry if I offended you. I'm on "vandal patrol" tonight (it's fun!) - and if you don't move fast the new articles move down the page and are lost. I thought your new article would make sense as you have done it but not as I feared it may have been. Hope you don't mind me asking you. B1atv 17:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Xi Septaton

An article that you have been involved in editing, Xi Septaton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xi Septaton. Thank you. Acidskater 02:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PSKCrest gif75.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PSKCrest gif75.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

Sources for List of Phi Sigma Kappa brothers?

Hey Corsulian, I noticed you started this page (which was recently renamed to take "notable" out of its title, per the notability guideline), and have been a major editor to the page; thanks for that. My question: do you have a source you are using for the informaiton on the page? If so, could you add a citation for that source to the page? I am concerned that without any sources, the page will raise red flags with respect to Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Thanks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My main edit to that page was just forming it as its own list page rather than have it as a cluttered extension of the Phi Sigma Kappa page. I will soon scan through it--the majority of those brothers are likely listed in the Phi Sigma Kappa self-published new member manual, "Hills and a Star." Corsulian (talk) 19:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add a source citation, citing the new member manual, to the article page? Otherwise the article does not conform to the verifiability policy and may be subject to deletion (which is not a good outcome given the amount of work you have put into it). UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given there are no sources for the article, I have proposed it for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see any deletion proposal--but I did add a handful of references. I started adding them for each entry but it looked silly. I'll see about a cleaner way to prove each one. At a cursory glance, I'd say about 95% from from Hills and a Star.Corsulian (talk) 20:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Sigma Kappa

In case you have yet to notice, I have fixed the problems you have listed. Hope it is satisfactory. Rau's Speak Page 14:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. What was the problem? Corsulian (talk) 18:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Citation Problem on MediaWiki 1.1.12

I'm having the same problem with the URL being listed in the citation. Did you ever discover a fix to this problem? I'm suspecting that the problem lies in the parser code.

Mark Duncan, mark@askmar.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.198.63.176 (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never did solve it or figure out exactly is happening--Just one of the many "hey...this isn't what it looks like on Wikipedia" issues. If I understand correctly, the extension roughly emulates but does not duplicate whatever Wikipedia uses so I'm not sure it'll ever perform exactly as expected. Corsulian (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've still been pursuing this on Mediawiki.org but no solid leads yet. I thought maybe the info was stored in the CSS but messing around with that hasn't helped. I did manage to get the entries in small text and add PDF icons - but those URLs are really bugging me. Corsulian (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My basis

My basis is that I lived there, saw the composites and chapter history. If you don't believe me, feel free to submit to your compulsion to change it back.--kubfann (talk) 00:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Sigma Epsilon

I just saw the article Phi Sigma Epsilon to which you have substantially contributed. In it you used a reference which is broken, <ref name="ATPS" />. Could you give the details of the reference, please, so I could fix it? Debresser (talk) 20:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed - Thanks. Corsulian (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Debresser (talk) 16:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jefferson Duo

Hi Corsulian, please join me in a discussion about the Talk:Jefferson Duo.
NYCRuss (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Association of Fraternity Advisors

The article Association of Fraternity Advisors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

highly promotional article, no third party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FraternityAdvisorAssoc-Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FraternityAdvisorAssoc-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lots 'o updates

Hello, Corsulian - At your leisure, please check the various PSK, PSE, Chapters and Brothers lists. I've been able to complete some extensive updates. These include:

Expansion of history of PSK
Expansion of history of PSE
Reduction of emphasis on PSP
Removal of Negative Bias relating to civil rights (written by disaffected Phi Tau/Cornell members)
Improvement of talk page discussion on civil rights and the merger
Added Kinny Coat of Arms and several other graphics
Deletion of vanity names, addition of Talk section on Brothers page with criteria for adding someone. This is referenced for new editors throughout main page article
Addition of colonies section and expansion info on the Chapters page
Addition of many chapter references, many chapter websites where available
Addition of notation showing where a campus had both a PSE and PSK chapter
Much more detail on the merger, with fair-minded treatment of positive results and minor dissent
Addition of many more Notable Phi Sigs, primarily using Baird's 20th edition and (surprisingly) the NIU chapter website as source

I've a collection of photos of chapterhouses that I'm about to upload and line. Still working on the frame for this, may leave as thumbnails to the right. I also need to complete referencing the list of Brothers. I still plan to review the entire PSK site for WP:Weight once I get the photos done, but in all, I'm pretty happy with it.

You still an active volunteer with George Mason? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jax MN (talk • contribs) 16:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion to remove Template:FratChapter2 and related

at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 May 25 Naraht (talk) 20:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]