Jump to content

User talk:Creativitylove

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Creativitylove, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Creativitylove! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Ghar Aayi (July 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Choudhary (July 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Ghar Aayi (July 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tame (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Choudhary (July 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 10:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shubhashish Jha has been accepted

[edit]
Shubhashish Jha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Living love talk 16:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Ghar Aayi has been accepted

[edit]
Lakshmi Ghar Aayi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Priyanka Choudhary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Priyanka Chahar Choudhary

[edit]

Hello, Creativitylove,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Umakant Bhalerao and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Priyanka Chahar Choudhary, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Umakant Bhalerao}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with creating copies of pages

[edit]

Don't create multiple copies of a page, as you did with Draft:Priyanka Choudhary, Priyanka Chahar Choudhary, and Priyanka Choudhary. Doing so creates numerous problems, including making it difficult for editors to keep track of page history. Also, don't move a page to a different title by copying its content and pasting it into a new page, because doing so destroys the editing history, which must be kept, as it serves the purpose of providing attribution of page content to its authors, which is required by Wikipedia's licensing terms. JBW (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Creativitylove. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TheSandDoctor Talk 00:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativitylove (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet of User:Commonedits. Infact, he is my good friend and we are also neighbours in real life. Which is why I made my appearance after a long time to vote for him. My vote has nothing to do with me becoming a sockpuppet. I came here out of friendship and not anything else. Please listen to my request.

Decline reason:

I'm convinced by what I read at the SPI. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---Creativitylove (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]