User talk:Credmaster 20
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome, Credmaster 20! | ||
---|---|---|
|
- thank you for the kind welcome!! and I'll be doing my best to contribute my knowledge here in Wikipedia especially for Indian aviation and airports Credmaster 20 (talk) 18:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that the edit you made to 2023-24 Indian Super League has been reverted. Kerela Blasters has not qualified for the play offs yet. Both Punjab FC and Chennaiyin FC can finish above them as they have better head to head goal difference and head to head points respectively.
May 2022
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Association football, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Check the talk page first as the hidden message says. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Possible Vandalism
[edit]The information you added does not belong in an encyclopaedia. Please refrain from making similar edits in the future. Good day.
Fenharrow (talk) 14:58, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Lewandowski, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 07:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lovesick Girls, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Braithwaite. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattythewhite Braithwaite did terminate his contract with Barcelona Credmaster 20 (talk) 08:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Do you have a source to confirm this? Mattythewhite (talk) 15:49, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattythewhite yes, here you go
- ref 1: https://sixsports.in/barcelona-are-reportedly-ready-to-terminate-the-contract-of-forward-martin-braithwaite/
- ref 2: https://m.allfootballapp.com/news/Headline/Barcelona-star-ready-to-terminate-contract-at-Camp-Nou---Reports/2874708 Credmaster 20 (talk) 15:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Neither of those confirm that his contact has actually been terminated, just that it might. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Do you have a source to confirm this? Mattythewhite (talk) 15:49, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sundar Pichai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of highest-grossing Malayalam films. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are currently at 3 reverts. Just be extremely careful now. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- @The Herald thank you. will be careful next time i make an edit. Credmaster 20 (talk) 08:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please use WP:ICTFSOURCES for identifying reliable sources in film related articles. Also, use accurate and adequate edit summaries. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Article usage
[edit]Hi. This is regarding your edit in Lakshadweep article. Article "an" is used in front of a vowel sound, not necessarily a vowel letter. While "an umbrella," "an apple," "a ball," and "a cat" are obvious examples, it's "a university," "a union," and "a European" despite the vowel letter (since they are pronounced "yoo-ni-versity," "yoo-nion," and "yoo-ro-pean," rather than "oo-ni-versity," "oo-nion," or "oo-ro-pean"). For the same reason, it's "an hour" or "an honest person" despite the consonant letter (since the consonant letter "h" is silent in these cases, making the pronunciation "our" or "onest person", thus warranting the article "an" before them). A quick google search would through more examples ([1], [2], [3]), if this is a bit confusing. Cheers. Rasnaboy (talk) 01:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Malayalam films of 2024 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aadirulez8 (talk) 21:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Aadirulez8 wdym? i have given adequate reason on why i removed Bramayugam. the sources weren't reliable enough and no other sources tend to claim that the movie grossed over 85 crs other than that certain site. hence, one can easily understand that it's nothing but promotional figures. Bramayugam did not cross 60crs Credmaster 20 (talk) 21:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The reference you provided is from March, whereas the Manorama website source is from April
- [4]https://www.onmanorama.com/entertainment/entertainment-news/2024/04/07/malayalam-movies-success-box-office-record-550-crores.html
- On what basis are you saying the source is not reliable?
- Hope we can clear it out before making more wild edits.
- Thanks, Aadirulez8 (talk) 21:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Guruvayoor Ambalanadayil, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 14:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to complementary and alternative medicine, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.