Jump to content

User talk:Cwingrav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello Cwingrav! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. If you're already loving Wikipedia and plan on becoming a Wikipedian you might consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor, just paste {{Adoptme}} into your userpage. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You might also consider joining a WikiProject so as to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! FisherQueen (Talk) 19:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

A tag has been placed on Chadwick Wingrave, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FisherQueen (Talk) 19:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chasm Toolkit

[edit]

Please do not delete the speedy deletion notice from pages that you have created. Static Universe 05:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you contribute to some other articles first to get the feel of things. Also read policies as linked above. Tyrenius 06:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:COI. Your text follows. Tyrenius 21:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chasm is a development method, architecture and library of reusable concepts. Chasm expresses single ideas as self-contained concepts that are successively refined as a developer's understanding of the 3D interaction grows during development. The architecture allows for the arrangement of concepts into a hierarchy of state machines and mediates the interaction between them. A library stores easily reusable concepts for the developer.

Chasm has been successfully used in several projects. Our initial experience indicates that it is superior to other, existing approaches: for instance, we were able to add new flavors to existing interaction techniques with a minimum of effort and without changing any of the underlying application.

Chasm is an instance of Concept-Oriented Design.

Links

http://people.cs.vt.edu/~cwingrav/wiki/index.php/Chasm Chasm Wiki

Discussion on Concept-Oriented Design

[edit]

You may wish to join in with this discussion. Tyrenius 15:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has been deleted per the discussion. Please study the writing guidelines as above. I recommend you contribute to articles which are not personal in this way. Tyrenius 21:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

[edit]

Honest :). If it means anything to you, let me say that when I first started contributing to Wikipedia I was also completely surprised by how serious the editing process is. The standards that are extensive, well-defined, and in their own way quite strict. I hope you don't take your initial experience too seriously. I think the comments about "Concept-Oriented Design" were a bit harsh and not always on the mark. I didn't realize that you had published in IEEE, and that's a serious achievement. Also the work that you and others are doing with Doug Bowman looks interesting. One suggestion, there's no article on 3D Interfaces and you might be able to make a contribution here. But please understand, I'm not trying to show you how you can write an article that would allow you to talk about Chasm, but showing you where you might be able to make a contribution. A B Carter (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cod_figure1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sign

[edit]

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Ty 01:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check on a page

[edit]

If an article is to be on wikipedia it needs to follow policies: WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, and usually guidelines such as WP:N and WP:RS. If it meets those requirements it will stay.

If an article shouldn't be on wiki, it can be proposed for deletion by following instructions at WP:AFD. If you are considering doing this, I suggest you read through some current/old debates listed there to get the hang of it.

Ty 01:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the article and its history to User:Cwingrav/Concept-Oriented Design, where you can work on it till it's ready to be moved back to article space. It should not be kept in your user space indefinitely. Please study WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:N and WP:RS, also the referencing guide below. Ty 01:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sign

[edit]

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Ty 01:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to referencing

[edit]

Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

Notice

The article Concept-oriented design has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Some guy's PhD dissertation. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]